Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 1;64(1):65-73.
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae544.

Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: what have we learned and what do we still need to learn?

Affiliations
Review

Difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: what have we learned and what do we still need to learn?

Zonne L M Hofman et al. Rheumatology (Oxford). .

Abstract

Difficult-to-treat RA (D2T RA) is an area of high unmet need. The prevalence reported in the first D2T RA cohort studies ranged from 5.5% to 27.5%. Key to the definition is a conviction by the patient and/or rheumatologist that disease management has become problematic and failure of at least two biological or targeted synthetic DMARDs. D2T RA is a multifactorial disease state which was reflected in data from D2T RA cohort studies: these pointed towards high prevalence of comorbidities and/or lower socioeconomic status in D2T RA subgroups, while others had persistent symptoms without these factors being present. A holistic approach is necessary to identify the root problems underlying D2T RA in individual patients. In this review, biological and non-biological drivers that should be considered to be optimized will be discussed in view of what we have learned from patient data emerging from the first D2T RA cohort studies.

Keywords: D2T RA; difficult-to-treat RA; patient management; rheumatoid arthritis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Factors contributing to difficult-to-treat RA
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Treatment algorithm for difficult-to-treat RA as based on the EULAR point to consider for the treatment of RA. aAdapted figure from. Nagy et al. [32]

References

    1. Aletaha D, Smolen JS.. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis: a review. JAMA 2018;320:1360–72. 10.1001/jama.2018.13103 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bergstra SA. et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2023;82:3–18. 10.1136/ard-2022-223356 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buch MH, Eyre S, McGonagle D.. Persistent inflammatory and non-inflammatory mechanisms in refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Nature reviews. Rheumatology 2021;17:17–33. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33293696 - PubMed
    1. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ. et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:685–99. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216655 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roodenrijs NMT, Welsing PMJ, van Roon J. et al. Mechanisms underlying DMARD inefficacy in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative review with systematic literature search. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 2022;61:3552–66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35238332. - PMC - PubMed

Substances