Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Aug 22;4(4):100386.
doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100386. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Using machine learning to predict the risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy using a contemporary nulliparous cohort

Affiliations

Using machine learning to predict the risk of developing hypertensive disorders of pregnancy using a contemporary nulliparous cohort

Jonathan S Schor et al. AJOG Glob Rep. .

Abstract

Background: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are significant drivers of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Current management strategies include early identification and initiation of risk mitigating interventions facilitated by a rules-based checklist. Advanced analytic techniques, such as machine learning, can potentially offer improved and refined predictive capabilities.

Objective: To develop and internally validate a machine learning prediction model for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) when initiating prenatal care.

Study design: We developed a prediction model using data from the prospective multisite cohort Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be (nuMoM2b) among low-risk individuals without a prior history of aspirin utilization for preeclampsia prevention. The primary outcome was the development of HDP. Random forest modeling was utilized to develop predictive models. Recursive feature elimination (RFE) was employed to create a reduced model for each outcome. Area under the curve (AUC), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and calibration curves were utilized to assess discrimination and accuracy. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the reduced model compared to existing risk factor-based algorithms.

Results: Of 9,124 assessed low risk nulliparous individuals, 21% (n=1,927) developed HDP. The prediction model for HDP had satisfactory discrimination with an AUC of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.75). After RFE, a parsimonious reduced model with 30 features was created with an AUC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.74). Variables included in the model after RFE included body mass index at the first study visit, pre-pregnancy weight, first trimester complete blood count results, and maximum systolic blood pressure at the first visit. Calibration curves for all models revealed relatively stable agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Sensitivity analysis noted superior sensitivity (AUC 0.80 vs 0.65) and specificity (0.65 vs 0.53) of the model compared to traditional risk factor-based algorithms.

Conclusion: In cohort of low-risk nulliparous pregnant individuals, a prediction model may accurately predict HDP diagnosis at the time of initiating prenatal care and aid employment of close interval monitoring and prophylactic measures earlier in pregnancy.

Keywords: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; Machine learning; Risk prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristics curve for predicting any hypertensive disorders of pregnancy among all pregnant persons for the full and reduced model
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver operating characteristics curves for predicting any hypertensive disorders of pregnancy by maternal race and ethnicity in the reduced model
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists aspirin guidelines (ASA) and prediction of any hypertensive disorders of pregnancy among all pregnant persons in the reduced model

References

    1. Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33(3):130–137. - PubMed
    1. Harmon QE, Huang L, Umbach DM, et al. Risk of fetal death with preeclampsia. Obstetr Gynecol. 2015;125(3):628. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Steegers EA, Von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. The Lancet. 2010;376(9741):631–644. - PubMed
    1. Magee LA, Nicolaides KH, Von Dadelszen P. Preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(19):1817–1832. - PubMed
    1. Levine LD, Ky B, Chirinos JA, et al. Prospective evaluation of cardiovascular risk 10 years after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79(24):2401–2411. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.383. - DOI - PMC - PubMed