Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Summer;18(3):225-231.
doi: 10.34172/joddd.41030. Epub 2024 Sep 7.

Have orthodontists changed their retention and follow-up protocols due to contemporary orthodontics? An online survey

Liliana Ávila Maltagliati  1 , Sandra Maria Mesquita Alves Uchôa  2 , Rogéria Cristina Calastro  3 , Mayara Paim Patel  1 , Ana Carla Raphaelli Nahás  1 , Hélio Doyle Pereira da Silva  1 , Murilo Matias  1
Affiliations

Have orthodontists changed their retention and follow-up protocols due to contemporary orthodontics? An online survey

Liliana Ávila Maltagliati et al. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024 Summer.

Abstract

Background: With advancements in orthodontic technology, treatment durations have shortened, often concluding at earlier ages. This shift prompts scrutiny of contemporary retention and post-treatment protocols. The study aimed to assess current professional preferences, compare them against patient age and treatment duration, and investigate the potential impacts of reduced treatment times on professional protocols, particularly when treatment concludes before pubertal growth.

Methods: A questionnaire comprising 12 multiple-choice questions focused on active treatment and retention phases was developed using an online survey platform. It was distributed to licensed orthodontists engaged in patient treatment. Bivariate analysis was conducted using ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test, with pairwise comparisons facilitated by the Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner method.

Results: Of 743 respondents, representing a 32% response rate, approximately 70% reported initiating treatment with fixed appliances in pre-pubertal patients. The most prevalent treatment combination involved commencing treatment during early permanent dentition and lasting between 12 to 24 months, resulting in treatment completion before full growth maturation. No discernible individualization was observed in retention protocols or post-retention follow-ups. Traditional retainer prescription post-orthodontic therapy was unanimous among respondents. Notably, experienced orthodontists tended to prefer regular patient visits for follow-up, while less experienced counterparts discharged patients after 12 months.

Conclusion: Contemporary orthodontic treatments are characterized by shorter durations, yet orthodontists have not adopted retention and post-treatment follow-up practices accordingly. There is a pressing need for evidence-based guidelines to develop protocols tailored to the shorter treatment durations and the increasing prevalence of younger patients completing treatment.

Keywords: Age factors; Clinical protocols; Corrective orthodontics; Orthodontic retainers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria, educational grants, participation in speakers’ bureaus, membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest, and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

References

    1. Tsichlaki A, Chin SY, Pandis N, Fleming PS. How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;149(3):308–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.09.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steinnes J, Johnsen G, Kerosuo H. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome in relation to retention status: an 8-year follow-up. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;151(6):1027–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnston CD, Littlewood SJ. Retention in orthodontics. Br Dent J. 2015;218(3):119–22. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.47. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Sarver DM. Later stages of development. In: Proffit WR, Fields HW Jr, Larson B, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 1993. p. 87-104.
    1. Thilander B. Dentoalveolar development in subjects with normal occlusion A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(2):109–20. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn124. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources