Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 24:76:102838.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102838. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Advancing patient-centric care: integrating patient reported outcomes for tolerability assessment in early phase clinical trials - insights from an expert virtual roundtable

Affiliations
Review

Advancing patient-centric care: integrating patient reported outcomes for tolerability assessment in early phase clinical trials - insights from an expert virtual roundtable

Christina Yap et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Early phase clinical trials provide an initial evaluation of therapies' risks and benefits to patients, including safety and tolerability, which typically relies on reporting outcomes by investigator and laboratory assessments. Use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to inform risks (tolerability) and benefits (improvement in disease symptoms) is more common in later than early phase trials. We convened a two-day expert roundtable covering: (1) the necessity and feasibility of a universal PRO core conceptual model for early phase trials; (2) the practical integration of PROs in early phase trials to inform tolerability assessment, guide dose decisions, or as real-time safety alerts to enhance investigator-reported adverse events. Participants (n = 22) included: patient advocates, regulators, clinicians, statisticians, pharmaceutical representatives, and PRO methodologists working across diverse clinical areas. In this manuscript, we report major recommendations resulting from the roundtable discussions corresponding to each theme. Additionally, we highlight priority areas necessitating further investigation.

Keywords: Dose-finding; Early phase trials; Patient-centred clinical development; Patient-reported outcomes; Phase I; Phase II; Quality of life; Tolerability; Trial designs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.Y. has received consulting fees from Faron Pharmaceuticals and an honoraria from Bayer. O.L.A. reported receiving grants from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research center, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, NIHR Blood Transplant Research Unit (BRTU), UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), Health Foundation, Gilead, Anthony Nolan, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Sarcoma UK. OLA declares personal fees from Gilead Sciences Ltd, Merck, and GlaxoSmithKline, Innovate UK outside the submitted work. E.B. has received payments as a scientific advisor for Navigating Cancer, AstraZeneca, Resilience, N-Power Medicine, and Verily. J.B. is an employee of AstraZeneca, with ownership interest in AstraZeneca and is engaged by Evinova, a separate healthtech business within the AstraZeneca group. A.H. has Research funding (paid to institution): Advancell, BMS, MSD, Macrogenics, Tyra Biosciences, Janssen, Seagen, Aveo, Roche/Genetech; Consulting (paid personally): MSD, Pfizer, Eisai, Astellas, Bayer. P.K. has shares in Merck Healthcare KgaA and is a Full-time employee of Merck Healthcare KgA. B.K.K. has grants paid direct to organisation from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz Pharma, Genentech, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Takeda, Dachii Sankyo, Blueprint, Medicines, Janssen, Amgen, Seagen, Manta Cares and personal consultancy fees from Eli Lilly, BMS, AbbVie, Shionogi. H.M.K. has received grants unrelated to the work from the American Heart Association to Jansson; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to Kenvue; National Institutes of Health to Novartis; Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to Pfizer and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. These grants and contracts are unrelated to the work above and are through Yale University or Yale New Haven Hospital. Received consulting fees from Massachusetts Medical Society (to Co-Editor, Journal Watch Cardiology); UpToDate (as Section Editor) and Ensight (unpaid advisor). Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers’ bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events would have received occasional travel expenses and/or honoraria to speak at various educational/academic venues. Received travel expenses and/or honoraria to speak at various educational/academic venues. Stocks in Element Science and Identifeye. A.M. has served on advisory boards for Janssen Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Merck Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, MSD Pharmaceuticals, Faron Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, AZ, Genmab Pharmaceuticals and Immutep Pharmaceuticals. Has received honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Faron Pharmaceuticals, Merck Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Seagen, Takeda Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Has travel support from Amgen Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Has received research funding from Astex Pharmaceutical, Merck Pharmaceuticals and MSD. J.P. is a Patient representative on CCTG. S.R. Research grants with Medical Research Council, NIH/NEI, NIHR outside permitted work. A.R. reported receiving grants from National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) paid to University of Birmingham and has funding outside the submitted work from NIHR, Birmingham City Council, ACCELERATE, Office of Health Disparity and Inequality. Support for attending meetings from Outsourcing in Clinical Trials UK/Ireland as invited speaker. Honoraria from Wellcome Sanger Institute Representative Research Strategy Advisory Group and ACCELERATE (Innovations for Children and Adolescents with Cancer) International Patient-Reported Outcomes Working Group—Core Group Member and Work-package Lead (unpaid). S.R. is employed by Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Stock in the following companies: Bristol Myers-Squibb, Gilead Sciences, IGM Biosciences, Merck & Co, Pfizer. L.I.W. has received consulting fees from Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb; Connect Multiple Myeloma registry, member Scientific Steering Committee. L.K.S. reports funding to institution from AZ, Bayer, Roche, GSK, Treadwell, REPARE, Novartis, Janssen, MERCK. Shares: AZ. H.A.W. is employed by Pfizer AG, Switzerland and owns non-voting shares of Roche Ltd. M.J.C. is the Director of Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation and Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research and a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) senior investigator; has received funding from Anthony Nolan, European Regional Development Fund-Demand Hub and Health Data Research UK, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Macmillan Cancer Support, Merck, NIHR, NIHR ARC WM, NIHR Birmingham BRC, NIHR BTRU Precision and Cellular Therapeutics, UCB Pharma, UKRI, and UK SPINE; and has received consultancy fees from Aparito, Astellas, Boehringer Ingelheim, CIS Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, Glaukos, GSK, Halfloop, Merck, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Pfizer, Takeda, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, outside of the submitted work. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the individual co-authors and may not be understood or quoted as being made on behalf of or reflecting the position of any organisation, committee, working party or group with which the co-authors are affiliated.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Benefits and challenges.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Core set of PRO conceptual model adapted from US FDA guidance.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Poll questions for participants for themes one and two. For illustrative purposes, high level of agreement (≥70% of participants) indicative that consensus is reached are coloured in green, and the rest are coloured in orange (<70% of participants).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Poll questions for participants for themes one and two. For illustrative purposes, high level of agreement (≥70% of participants) indicative that consensus is reached are coloured in green, and the rest are coloured in orange (<70% of participants).

References

    1. Cook N., Hansen A.R., Siu L.L., Abdul Razak A.R. Early phase clinical trials to identify optimal dosing and safety. Mol Oncol. 2015;9(5):997–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.07.025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harrington J.A., Hernandez-Guerrero T.C., Basu B. Early phase clinical trial designs – state of play and adapting for the future. Clin Oncol. 2017;29(12):770–777. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.10.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yap C., Rekowski J., Ursino M., et al. Enhancing quality and impact of early phase dose-finding clinical trial protocols: SPIRIT Dose-finding Extension (SPIRIT-DEFINE) guidance. BMJ. 2023;383 doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076386. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry . 2018. Guidelines for phase I clinical trials.https://www.abpi.org.uk/publications/guidelines-for-phase-i-clinical-tri...
    1. Lai-Kwon J., Yin Z., Minchom A., Yap C. Trends in patient-reported outcome use in early phase dose-finding oncology trials – an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov. Cancer Med. 2021;10(22):7943–7957. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4307. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources