In vitro activity assessment of cefiderocol against Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp., including β-lactam nonsusceptible molecularly characterized isolates, collected from 2020 to 2021 in the United States and European hospitals
- PMID: 39387599
- PMCID: PMC11537082
- DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01474-24
In vitro activity assessment of cefiderocol against Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp., including β-lactam nonsusceptible molecularly characterized isolates, collected from 2020 to 2021 in the United States and European hospitals
Abstract
This study reports the activity of cefiderocol against Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. isolates collected from the United States and Europe, including Israel and Turkey, from 2020 to 2021. Among Enterobacterales, 2.8% were carbapenem nonsusceptible (CNSE); cefiderocol inhibited 96.6%/85.1% [Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)/European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints] of these isolates. Imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and ceftazidime-avibactam displayed susceptibilities lower than cefiderocol against CNSE isolates (67.4-84.6% susceptible, CLSI). Cefiderocol was the only agent active against CNSE isolates carrying metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) carbapenemase or multiple carbapenemase genes (84.6%-92.3% susceptible, CLSI). Approximately 18% of carbapenem-susceptible Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis carried extended-spectrum-β-lactamases and/or plasmid-borne AmpC-encoding genes; cefiderocol inhibited 99.8%-100.0% (CLSI) of these genotypic groups. Multi-drug resistance (MDR) phenotypes were observed in 16.9% and 52.5% of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii-calcoaceticus isolates, respectively. Carbapenemase genes were rare (4.9%) among cephalosporin and/or carbapenem nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa, compared to 87.6% carriage in A. baumannii-calcoaceticus, respectively. Against the MDR and carbapenemase-carrying P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii-calcoaceticus subsets, cefiderocol was active against 98.6%/98.7% and 97.1%/97.4% (CLSI), respectively. Only 69 isolates (0.3%) across all species groups were identified as cefiderocol nonsusceptible per CLSI criteria (>4 mg/L). Cefiderocol was the most active agent in vitro against Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp., with uniform activity against all phenotypic- and genotypic-resistant subsets. Coupled with the low incidence of nonsusceptibility observed across species groups, these results demonstrate cefiderocol as an important option for treating infections caused by pathogens with diverse mechanisms of resistance in US and European hospitals.IMPORTANCEThe worldwide spread of multi-drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter spp. poses a serious challenge in healthcare settings as infections caused by these organisms are commonly refractory to many frontline therapeutic agents. Multiple global health organizations highlighted these pathogens as critical priorities for new antibiotic development, thus necessitating continued surveillance of the activities of currently available antimicrobial agents and circulating mechanisms of resistance. To meet this need, this study phenotypically and genotypically characterized priority Gram-negative pathogens collected from patients in US and European hospitals to examine the activity of cefiderocol and other currently available treatment options, including carbapenems and β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The results presented here provide a detailed perspective to healthcare practitioners of cefiderocol's broad applicability, manifested in high activity and low nonsusceptibility rates, across phenotypic and genotypic organism groups relative to other agents and further support its use against the most intransigent infections.
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; CRE; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; cefiderocol; multidrug resistance.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare a conflict of interest (see Acknowledgments).
References
-
- CDC . 2019. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/antimicrobial-resistance/media/pdfs/2019-ar-threats-.... Retrieved Aug 2024.
-
- Kadri SS, Adjemian J, Lai YL, Spaulding AB, Ricotta E, Prevots DR, Palmore TN, Rhee C, Klompas M, Dekker JP, Powers JH, Suffredini AF, Hooper DC, Fridkin S, Danner RL, National Institutes of Health Antimicrobial Resistance Outcomes Research Initiative (NIH–ARORI) . 2018. Difficult-to-treat resistance in Gram-negative bacteremia at 173 US hospitals: retrospective cohort analysis of prevalence, predictors, and outcome of resistance to all first-line agents. Clin Infect Dis 67:1803–1814. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy378 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. 2021. Infectious diseases society of america guidance on the treatment of extended-Spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Clin Infect Dis 72:e169–e183. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1478doi:33106864 - DOI - PubMed
-
- WHO . 2017. Prioritization of pathogens to guide discovery, research and development of new antibiotics for drug-resistant bacterial infections, including tuberculosis. World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/311820
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
