Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2438460.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.38460.

Macronutrient and Micronutrient Intake Among US Women Aged 20 to 44 Years

Affiliations

Macronutrient and Micronutrient Intake Among US Women Aged 20 to 44 Years

Derek Miketinas et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Nutritional status before and during pregnancy is important for maternal health and fetal growth and development.

Objective: To describe secular trends in nutrient intake from foods, beverages, and supplements among pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age in the US.

Design, setting, and participants: This was a secondary series of cross-sectional analyses of the 1999-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Pregnant (n = 1392) and nonpregnant (n = 9737) women aged 20 to 44 years who provided at least 1 reliable dietary recall were included for analysis. These analyses were performed between February 2022 and July 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcomes included the mean usual intake of macronutrients and micronutrients, as well as the prevalence of inadequate intake of micronutrients.

Results: This representative sample included 1392 pregnant women (mean [SE] age, 28.5 [0.3] years) and 9737 nonpregnant women (mean [SE] age, 32.2 [0.1] years). Among pregnant women, a weighted mean (SE) of 27.0% (1.8%) of women were in their first trimester, and 33.8% (2.2%) were in their second trimester. Mean (SE) carbohydrate intake decreased between 1999-2000 and 2013-2018 among pregnant women (306.9 [7.6] to 274.9 [5.7] g/d; β = -2.1 [0.4]; P < .001) and between 1999-2000 and 2017-2018 among nonpregnant women (251.9 [4.9] to 216.9 [3.3] g/d; β = -1.9 [0.4]; P = .002). Between 1999-2000 and 2013-2018, the proportion of pregnant women who consumed below the Estimated Average Requirement of vitamin A increased by 10.9 percentage points (pp) (95% CI, 5.2-16.7 pp), and the proportion of pregnant women who consumed below the Estimated Average Requirement of vitamin C increased by 8.9 pp (95% CI, 3.9-14.0 pp). Similarly, the proportion of nonpregnant women with inadequate intake of vitamin A, vitamin C, and iron increased by 19.9 pp (95% CI, 12.3-27.5 pp), 11.1 pp (95% CI, 4.5-17.7 pp), and 4.9 pp (95% CI, 1.7-8.2 pp), respectively, between 1999-2000 and 2017-2018. The mean (SE) calcium intake increased from 1120.6 (41.4) to 1308.7 (49.0) mg/d for pregnant women (β = 11.7 [4.3]; P = .03) and from 849.5 (19.8) to 981.2 (27.9) mg/d for nonpregnant women (β = 6.7 [2.6]; P = .03; β2 = -1.3 [0.2]; P < .001). Among pregnant women, the prevalence of inadequate intake decreased by 16.1 pp (95% CI, 8.3-23.9 pp) for magnesium (P < .001) and 33.2 pp (95% CI, 24.0-42.4 pp) for vitamin K (P < .001); among nonpregnant women, the proportion with inadequate intake decreased by 16.1 pp (95% CI, 10.4-21.7 pp) for calcium (P < .001), 15.5 pp (95% CI, 7.3-23.6 pp) for magnesium (P < .001), and 33.3 pp (23.5-43.0 pp) for vitamin K (P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: This cross-sectional study of pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age found that vitamin A, vitamin C, and iron intake decreased over the past 2 decades, which may have substantial maternal and fetal health implications. By identifying these nutrient gaps and trends in inadequate intake in this at-risk population, scientific, health care, and regulatory communities may be better poised to adopt recommendations to improve nutrient intake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Miketinas reported receiving grants from Mead Johnson outside the submitted work and was employed by Texas Woman's Universit. Dr Luo reported serving as a consultant for Mead Johnson during the conduct of the study and was employed by Emory University. Drs Firth, Bailey, Gross, and Brink and Ms Bender were employed at Reckitt/Mead Johnson. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Participant Flowchart: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999-2018
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Changes in the Proportion of Women Who Consumed Below the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) or Adequate Intake (AI) Between 1999-2000 and 2013-2018 (Pregnant Women) and 2017-2018 (Nonpregnant Women)
Arrows indicate whether the prevalence of inadequate intake is increasing (arrows pointed to the right) or decreasing (arrows pointed to the left). Estimates are presented as change in percentage points and 95% CIs. P values denote whether changes between time points were significantly different. DHA indicates docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; and NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. aAdequate intake.

References

    1. Procter SB, Campbell CG. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: nutrition and lifestyle for a healthy pregnancy outcome. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(7):1099-1103. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2014.05.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hanley B, Dijane J, Fewtrell M, et al. . Metabolic imprinting, programming and epigenetics—a review of present priorities and future opportunities. Br J Nutr. 2010;104(S1)(suppl 1):S1-S25. doi:10.1017/S0007114510003338 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Koletzko B, Godfrey KM, Poston L, et al. ; EarlyNutrition Project Systematic Review Group . Nutrition during pregnancy, lactation and early childhood and its implications for maternal and long-term child health: the EarlyNutrition Project recommendations. Ann Nutr Metab. 2019;74(2):93-106. doi:10.1159/000496471 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cetin I, Bühling K, Demir C, et al. . Impact of micronutrient status during pregnancy on early nutrition programming. Ann Nutr Metab. 2019;74(4):269-278. doi:10.1159/000499698 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids. National Academies Press; 2005. - PubMed

Publication types