Vocal Emotion Perception in Children Using Cochlear Implant
- PMID: 39388519
- PMCID: PMC11562208
- DOI: 10.5152/iao.2024.241480
Vocal Emotion Perception in Children Using Cochlear Implant
Abstract
The significance of emotional prosody in social communication is well-established, yet research on emotion perception among cochlear implant (CI) users is less extensive. This study aims to explore vocal emotion perception in children using CI and bimodal hearing devices and compare them with their normal hearing (NH) peers. The study involved children aged 4-10 years with unilateral CI and contralateral hearing aid (HA), matched with NH peers by gender and listening age. Children were selected using snowball sampling for the CI group and purposive sampling for the NH group. Vocal emotion perception was assessed for semantically neutral sentences in "happy," "sad," and "angry" emotions using a 3 alternate forced choice test. The NH group demonstrated significantly superior emotion perception (P=.002) compared to the CI group. Both groups accurately identified the "happy" emotion. However, the NH group had higher scores for the "angry" emotion compared to the "sad" emotion, while the CI group showed better scores for "sad" than "angry" emotion. Bimodal hearing devices improved recognition of "sad"and "angry" emotions, with a decrease in confusion percentages. The unbiased hit (Hu) value provided more substantial insight than the hit score. Bimodal hearing devices enhance the perception of "sad" and "angry" vocal emotions compared to using a CI alone, likely due to the HA providing the temporal fine structure cues, thereby better representing fundamental frequency variations. Children with unilateral CI benefit significantly in the perception of emotions by using a HA in the contralateral ear, aiding in better socio-emotional development.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Perception of Child-Directed Versus Adult-Directed Emotional Speech in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users.Ear Hear. 2020 Sep/Oct;41(5):1372-1382. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000862. Ear Hear. 2020. PMID: 32149924 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of Emotional Prosody Identification by School-Age Children With Cochlear Implants and Their Peers With Normal Hearing.Ear Hear. 2024 Mar-Apr 01;45(2):411-424. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001436. Epub 2023 Oct 9. Ear Hear. 2024. PMID: 37811966 Free PMC article.
-
Voice Emotion Recognition by Mandarin-Speaking Children with Cochlear Implants.Ear Hear. 2022 Jan/Feb;43(1):165-180. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001085. Ear Hear. 2022. PMID: 34288631
-
Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.Ear Hear. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;42(6):1727-1740. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001057. Ear Hear. 2021. PMID: 34294630 Free PMC article.
-
Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.Hear Res. 2017 Sep;352:30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 11. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 28088500 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bryant G, Barrett HC. Vocal emotion recognition across disparate cultures. J Cogn Cult. 2008;8(1-2):135 148. (10.1163/156770908X289242) - DOI
-
- Zajonc RB. Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. Am Psychol. 1980;35(2):151 175. (10.1037/0003-066X.35.2.151) - DOI
-
- Wallbott HG, Scherer KR. Cues and channels in emotion recognition. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(4):690 699. (10.1037/0022-3514.51.4.690) - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical