Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jan 1;142(1):98-106.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000005256.

Protamine Dosing for Heparin Reversal after Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Double-blinded Prospective Randomized Control Trial Comparing Two Strategies

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Protamine Dosing for Heparin Reversal after Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Double-blinded Prospective Randomized Control Trial Comparing Two Strategies

Pankaj Jain et al. Anesthesiology. .

Abstract

Background: Drug shortages are a frequent challenge in current clinical practice. Certain drugs (e.g., protamine) lack alternatives, and inadequate supplies can limit access to services. Conventional protamine dosing uses heparin ratio-based calculations for heparin reversal after cardiopulmonary bypass and may result in excess protamine utilization and potential harm due to its intrinsic anticoagulation. This study hypothesized that a fixed 250-mg protamine dose would be comparable, as measured by the activated clotting time, to a 1:1 (1 mg for every 100 U) protamine-to-heparin ratio-based strategy for heparin reversal and that protamine would be conserved.

Methods: In a single-center, double-blinded trial, consenting elective adult cardiac surgical patients without preexisting coagulopathy or ongoing anticoagulation and a calculated initial heparin dose greater than or equal to 27,500 U were randomized to receive, after cardiopulmonary bypass, protamine as a fixed dose (250 mg) or a ratio-based dose (1 mg:100 U heparin). The primary outcome was the activated clotting time after initial protamine administration, assessed by Student's t test. Secondary outcomes included total protamine, the need for additional protamine, and the cumulative 24-h chest tube output.

Results: There were 62 and 63 patients in the fixed- and ratio-based dose groups, respectively. The mean postprotamine activated clotting time was not different between groups (-2.0 s; 95% CI, -7.2 to 3.3 s; P = 0.47). Less total protamine per case was administered in the fixed-dose group (-2.1 50-mg vials; 95% CI, -2.4 to -1.8; P < 0.0001). There was no difference in the cumulative 24-h chest tube output (difference, -77 ml; 95% CI, 220 to 65 ml; P = 0.28).

Conclusions: A 1:1 heparin ratio-based protamine dosing strategy compared to a fixed 250-mg dose resulted in the administration of a larger total dose of protamine but no difference in either the initial activated clotting time or the amount postoperative chest-tube bleeding.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kunz SA, Miles LF, Ianno DJ, et al.: The effect of protamine dosing variation on bleeding and transfusion after heparinisation for cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 2018; 33:445–52
    1. Hecht P, Besser M, Falter F: Are we able to dose protamine accurately yet? A review of the protamine conundrum. J Extra Corpor Technol 2020; 52:63–70
    1. Hajjar LA, Vincent JL, Galas FR, et al.: Transfusion requirements after cardiac surgery: The TRACS randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010; 304:1559–67
    1. Boer C, Meesters MI, Veerhoek D, Vonk ABA: Anticoagulant and side-effects of protamine in cardiac surgery: A narrative review. Br J Anaesth 2018; 120:914–27
    1. Rinehardt EK, Sivarajan M: Costs and wastes in anesthesia care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2012; 25:221–5

Publication types