Patient preferences for conservative treatment of shoulder pain: a discrete choice experiment
- PMID: 39388636
- PMCID: PMC11878378
- DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmae050
Patient preferences for conservative treatment of shoulder pain: a discrete choice experiment
Abstract
Background: Shoulder pain is common amongst adults, but little is known about patients' preferences.
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine patients' preferences for treatment options offered for shoulder pain in primary care.
Methods: A discrete choice experiment was used to investigate these preferences. Adults with shoulder pain were asked to make 12 choices between two treatment options, or to opt-out. The attributes of the 12 treatment options were presented as varying in: treatment effectiveness (50%, 70%, or 90%), risk of relapse (10%, 20%, or 30%), time to pain reduction (2 or 6 weeks), prevention of relapse (yes/no), requiring injection (yes/no), and including physiotherapy (none, 6, or 12 sessions). A conditional logit model with latent class analysis was used for the analysis and a class assignment model.
Results: Three hundred and twelve participants completed the questionnaire with mean age of 52 ± 15.2 years. Latent class analysis revealed three groups. Group 1 preferred to opt-out, unless the attributes were highly favorable (90% effectiveness). Group 2 preferred treatment, but not an injection. Group 3 preferred to opt-out and did not opt for treatment. The likelihood of a participant belonging to one of these groups was 68.8%, 9.3%, and 21.9%, respectively. The class assignment was related to having previously received injection or physiotherapy, as they did not prefer that same treatment again.
Conclusion: This study showed that most patients with shoulder pain prefer to opt-out, unless treatment attributes are highly favorable. Characteristics of influence on this decision was whether the patient had received an injection or physiotherapy before.
Keywords: conservative treatment; decision making; exercise therapy; patient preference; primary health care; shoulder pain.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Patient Preferences for Attributes of Androgen Deprivation Therapies in Prostate Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Latent Class Analysis.Adv Ther. 2024 Oct;41(10):3934-3950. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02955-1. Epub 2024 Aug 21. Adv Ther. 2024. PMID: 39167332 Free PMC article.
-
Toward Patient-Centered Telerehabilitation Design: Understanding Chronic Pain Patients' Preferences for Web-Based Exercise Telerehabilitation Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 20;19(1):e26. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5951. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28108429 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
COVID-19 Vaccine Preferences in General Populations in Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States: Discrete Choice Experiment.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Oct 16;10:e57242. doi: 10.2196/57242. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024. PMID: 39412841 Free PMC article.
-
Progressive exercise compared with best-practice advice, with or without corticosteroid injection, for rotator cuff disorders: the GRASP factorial RCT.Health Technol Assess. 2021 Aug;25(48):1-158. doi: 10.3310/hta25480. Health Technol Assess. 2021. PMID: 34382931 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Patients' Preferences for Artificial Intelligence Applications Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in China: Discrete Choice Experiment.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 23;23(2):e22841. doi: 10.2196/22841. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33493130 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Addressing treatment fatigue, therapeutic inertia, and cognitive dissonance in musculoskeletal pain management in primary care setting.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 25;12:1543434. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1543434. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40636354 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Kuijpers T, van der Windt D, van der Heijden G, et al.. Systematic review of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders. Pain 2004;109:420–31. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources