Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 7;42(2):cmae050.
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmae050.

Patient preferences for conservative treatment of shoulder pain: a discrete choice experiment

Affiliations

Patient preferences for conservative treatment of shoulder pain: a discrete choice experiment

Annelotte H C Versloot et al. Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Shoulder pain is common amongst adults, but little is known about patients' preferences.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine patients' preferences for treatment options offered for shoulder pain in primary care.

Methods: A discrete choice experiment was used to investigate these preferences. Adults with shoulder pain were asked to make 12 choices between two treatment options, or to opt-out. The attributes of the 12 treatment options were presented as varying in: treatment effectiveness (50%, 70%, or 90%), risk of relapse (10%, 20%, or 30%), time to pain reduction (2 or 6 weeks), prevention of relapse (yes/no), requiring injection (yes/no), and including physiotherapy (none, 6, or 12 sessions). A conditional logit model with latent class analysis was used for the analysis and a class assignment model.

Results: Three hundred and twelve participants completed the questionnaire with mean age of 52 ± 15.2 years. Latent class analysis revealed three groups. Group 1 preferred to opt-out, unless the attributes were highly favorable (90% effectiveness). Group 2 preferred treatment, but not an injection. Group 3 preferred to opt-out and did not opt for treatment. The likelihood of a participant belonging to one of these groups was 68.8%, 9.3%, and 21.9%, respectively. The class assignment was related to having previously received injection or physiotherapy, as they did not prefer that same treatment again.

Conclusion: This study showed that most patients with shoulder pain prefer to opt-out, unless treatment attributes are highly favorable. Characteristics of influence on this decision was whether the patient had received an injection or physiotherapy before.

Keywords: conservative treatment; decision making; exercise therapy; patient preference; primary health care; shoulder pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Relative importance of attributes separately for all classes of the latent class model as well as adjusted for class probability based on a discrete choice experiment on treatment preferences for patients with shoulder pain including 312 patients with current shoulder pain or shoulder pain in the past 2 years (2023).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van Doorn PF, de Schepper EIT, Rozendaal RM, et al.. The incidence and management of shoulder complaints in general practice: a retrospective cohort study. Fam Pract 2021;38:582–8. 10.1093/fampra/cmab022 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ottenheijm RP, Cals JW, Winkens B, et al.. Ultrasound imaging to tailor the treatment of acute shoulder pain: a randomised controlled trial in general practice. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011048. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011048 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kuijpers T, van der Windt D, van der Heijden G, et al.. Systematic review of prognostic cohort studies on shoulder disorders. Pain 2004;109:420–31. - PubMed
    1. Bot SD, van der Waal JM, Terwee CB, et al.. Incidence and prevalence of complaints of the neck and upper extremity in general practice. Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:118–23. 10.1136/ard.2003.019349 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greving K, Dorrestijn O, Winters JC, et al.. Incidence, prevalence, and consultation rates of shoulder complaints in general practice. Scand J Rheumatol 2012;41:150–5. 10.3109/03009742.2011.605390 - DOI - PubMed