Clinical practices in the management and follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a comprehensive review
- PMID: 39388912
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.042
Clinical practices in the management and follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a comprehensive review
Abstract
Objectives: To review and compare existing guidelines on the intrapartum management and postpartum follow-up of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of clinical guidelines related to OASIS management, focusing on intrapartum care and postpartum follow-up. Searches were performed in July 2024 across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Guidelines published after 2010 in English were included.
Results: Nine national guidelines were included. There was a consensus on OASIS classification and immediate management, particularly regarding suture techniques, materials, and the necessity of adequate analgesia. However, notable variations were identified in the timing of repair, specialist involvement, use of prophylactic antibiotics, and post-operative care protocols. Postpartum follow-up practices also varied, especially regarding the role of physiotherapy and the timing of specialist consultations, reflecting inconsistencies in long-term care recommendations.
Conclusion: Significant variability existed in the guidelines for the management and follow-up of OASIS, particularly in postpartum care. This study underscored the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines to ensure consistent and optimal care for women affected by OASIS.
Keywords: Clinical Practice; Guidelines; OASIS; Perineal care; Recommendations; Severe perineal tears.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Professor M. Cosson has contracts from Ab medica, Promedon, Syliva, Proveday and receives consulting fees from Boston scientific and honoraria for educational events from Boston scientific and Promedon. He is also a founder of Digyne start-up.The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical