Implementation and outcomes of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in East and Central Africa: A prospective non-randomized controlled trial in Rwanda's Tertiary Teaching Hospital
- PMID: 39390308
- DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12371
Implementation and outcomes of an enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in East and Central Africa: A prospective non-randomized controlled trial in Rwanda's Tertiary Teaching Hospital
Abstract
Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have demonstrated efficacy in optimizing perioperative care and improving patient outcomes in various surgeries. However, their implementation and outcomes in resource-limited settings remain underexplored. This study aimed to assess the implementation of an ERAS protocol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in such a setting.
Methods: This prospective non-randomized controlled trial involved 100 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, Rwanda. The first 50 patients on the ERAS pathway were prospectively evaluated and retrospectively compared to the last 50 patients operated on before ERAS implementation. Data on demographics, preoperative information, intraoperative compliance, postoperative events, and patient feedback were collected and analyzed.
Results: ERAS implementation resulted in a significant reduction in hospital length of stay (LOS) (p < 0.001) without increase in complications. Compliance with ERAS principles, including preoperative education and perioperative management, was more than 90%. ERAS also reduced costs due to quicker recovery and shorter hospital LOS.
Conclusion: The implementation of ERAS for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a limited-resource setting is feasible and safe, suggesting the possibility of its potential adoption in other abdominal procedures. A high level of adherence to the ERAS pathway can be achieved with effective patient education and the dedication of healthcare providers.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05516056.
Keywords: enhanced recovery after surgery; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; perioperative care; postoperative outcomes.
© 2024 International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie (ISS/SIC).
Comment in
-
Implementing Surgical Interventions as a Triad Care Bundle.World J Surg. 2025 Mar;49(3):615-616. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12493. Epub 2025 Jan 29. World J Surg. 2025. PMID: 39888026 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Ljungqvist, Olle. 2014. “ERAS‐Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: Moving Evidence‐Based Perioperative Care to Practice.” JPEN ‐ Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 238(5): 559–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607114523451.
-
- Scott, M. J., G. Baldini, K. C. H. Fearon, A. Feldheiser, L. S. Feldman, T. J. Gan, O. Ljungqvist, et al. 2015. “Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) for Gastrointestinal Surgery, Part 1: Pathophysiological Considerations.” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 59(10): 1212–1231. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12601.
-
- Joliat, G.‐Romain, Olle Ljungqvist, Tracy Wasylak, Oliver Peters, and Nicolas Demartines. 2028. “Beyond Surgery: Clinical and Economic Impact of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs.” BMC Health Services Research 18(1): 1008. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913‐018‐3824‐0.
-
- Ljungqvist, Olle, Michael Scott, and Kenneth C. Fearon. 2017. “Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: A Review.” JAMA Surgery 152(3): 292. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.
-
- Roulin, D., A. Donadini, S. Gander, A.‐C. Griesser, C. Blanc, M. Hübner, M. Schäfer, and N. Demartines. 2013. “Cost‐effectiveness of the Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Colorectal Surgery: Cost‐Effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Colorectal Surgery.” British Journal of Surgery 100(8): 1108–1114. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9184.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical