Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;81(2):599-606.
doi: 10.1002/ps.8454. Epub 2024 Oct 11.

Appropriate sampling to aid on-farm assessments of the haplotype composition of Zymoseptoria tritici populations

Affiliations

Appropriate sampling to aid on-farm assessments of the haplotype composition of Zymoseptoria tritici populations

Catherine Harrison et al. Pest Manag Sci. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Zymoseptoria tritici causes Septoria tritici blotch (STB), which is the biggest threat to wheat in the UK. Azole fungicides have been used since the 1980s to control STB, but resistance to these chemicals is now widespread. The main resistance mechanism is based on the accumulation of CYP51 mutations, with 33 mutations reported. Hence, farmers need an accurate estimate of the haplotype composition of Z. tritici populations to develop effective fungicide treatments and resistance management.

Results: Isolates from Z. tritici lesions were collected from three fields across three commercial farms using two sampling approaches. Analysis of the isolate sequences revealed that the number of distinct haplotypes and the haplotype composition of the most dominant haplotypes varied only between and not within farms. Conventional W-shaped and point sampling both found the same percentage of distinct haplotypes and frequencies of the six most dominant haplotypes.

Conclusion: The results from this survey suggest that farm-resistance-management strategies should be based on farm-specific rather than national data, and that sampling within a single field is sufficient. W-shaped sampling is often recommended in sampling approaches, but this survey finds no evidence of this approach being more appropriate for detecting a greater percentage of distinct haplotypes which may aid the discovery of potential new resistance threats. © 2024 Fera Science Ltd. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Keywords: CYP51; Zymoseptoria tritici; azole; fungicide resistance; haplotype.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Minimum spanning haplotype network for Zymoseptoria tritici representing the haplotype distribution between farms (green = Louth; purple = Salisbury; red = Dorset) amongst all isolates that were successfully sequenced. Each circle depicts a unique haplotype and the size of each circle is proportional to the number of isolates of that haplotype. CYP51 amino acid mutations are denoted by the hatch marks across lines connecting haplotypes with each hatch mark representing a mutation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Minimum spanning haplotype network for Zymoseptoria tritici representing the haplotype distribution between farms (green = Louth; purple = Salisbury; red = Dorset) amongst all isolates that were successfully sequenced after collection using (a) the H sampling method (point sampling at two locations within a field) and (b) the W sampling method (conventional W‐shaped sampling). Each circle depicts a unique haplotype and the size of each circle is proportional to the number of isolates of that haplotype. CYP51 amino acid mutations are denoted by the hatch marks across lines connecting haplotypes with each hatch mark representing a mutation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PCA of the principal components (PC) that explain the most variability between samples related to (a) haplotype composition and (b) relative haplotype presence by farm for the six most common haplotypes. Proportion of variability explained by each axis is presented in brackets within the axis label. Red circles = Dorset; Green triangles = Louth and Blue squares = Salisbury.

References

    1. McDonald BA and Mundt CC, How knowledge of pathogen population biology informs management of Septoria Tritici Blotch. Phytopathology 106:948–955 (2016). - PubMed
    1. Fones H and Gurr S, The impact of Septoria tritici blotch disease on wheat: an EU perspective. Fungal Genet Biol 79:3–7 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gosling P and Roberts AMI, Estimating costs of septoria leaf blotch (Zymoseptoria tritici) on wheat to the UK agricultural sector. Asp Appl Biol 134:29–35 (2017).
    1. Vagndorf N, Justesen AF, Andersen JR, Jahoor A, Sindberg S and Jørgensen LN, Resistance stability to Septoria tritici blotch and comparison of screening methods for ranking STB disease. J Plant Dis Prot 126:191–201 (2019).
    1. Chaloner TM, Fones HN, Varma V, Bebber DP and Gurr SJ, A new mechanistic model of weather‐dependent Septoria tritici blotch disease risk. Philos Trans R Soc B 374:20180266 (2019). - PMC - PubMed

Substances

Supplementary concepts

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources