Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 24;10(19):e38349.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38349. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.

The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate compared with propofol for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under monitored anesthesia care: A single-center randomized controlled clinical trial

Affiliations

The efficacy and safety of remimazolam tosilate compared with propofol for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under monitored anesthesia care: A single-center randomized controlled clinical trial

Biyun Zhou et al. Heliyon. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Although remimazolam tosilate is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that causes less respiratory and circulatory depression than propofol, studies evaluating its efficacy and safety during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam and propofol for ERCP performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC).

Methods: This study is a randomized controlled clinical trial featuring a noninferiority design. A total of 102 eligible patients undergoing ERCP under MAC were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam tosilate group (R group) or the propofol group (P group) in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the R group were sedated with remimazolam tosilate, while those in the P group received propofol, both under MAC. The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate of ERCP completion under MAC. Secondary outcomes included the time to loss of consciousness, sedative effects, and perioperative adverse events at various time points for patients in both groups.

Results: Baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. The successful completion rate for ERCP under MAC was 100 % in the R group and 96.1 % in the P group, resulting in a difference of 3.92 % (95 % CI: -2%, 10 %). This difference met the pre-established criterion of being greater than -8%. The total number of norepinephrine infusions, as well as the incidence of intravenous injection pain, post-induction hypotension, post-induction bradycardia, intraoperative hypotension, respiratory depression, and hypoxemia, were significantly lower in the R group compared to the P group. Conversely, the total number of phloroglucinol uses, body movements, and instances of rapid gastrointestinal peristalsis were significantly higher in the R group than in the P group.

Discussion: Remimazolam-based MAC for ERCP exhibited non-inferior efficacy compared to propofol-based MAC, while also resulting in fewer circulatory and respiratory adverse events during the procedures. Nevertheless, future studies with larger sample sizes are required to evaluate the utility of remimazolam in elderly patients.

Keywords: Adverse events; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Hypotension; Monitored anesthesia care; Propofol; Remimazolam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient flowchart with CONSORT guidelines. FAS, Full analysis set; SS, Safety analysis set; PP, Per Protocol.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The Kaplan-Meier curves comparing the cumulative incidence of MAP of <65 mmHg during the study period between the Remimazolam group (blue) and the Propofol group (red). MAP, mean arterial pressure. Note: This analysis considers only the initial occurrence of hypotensive events for each patient, despite the possibility of multiple hypotensive episodes occurring per patient.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Norepinephrine infusion in patients with intraoperative hypotension between the Remimazolam group (blue) and the Propofol group (red).

References

    1. Itoi T. Pancreatobiliary endoscopy: diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Dig. Endosc. 2022;34(Suppl 2):99–101. doi: 10.1111/den.14130. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Merwe S.W., van Wanrooij R.L.J., Bronswijk M., et al. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy. 2022;54(2):185–205. doi: 10.1055/a-1717-1391. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azimaraghi O., Bilal M., Amornyotin S., et al. Consensus guidelines for the perioperative management of patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Br. J. Anaesth. 2023;130(6):763–772. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.03.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ju J.W., Lee D.J., Chung J., et al. Effect of remimazolam versus propofol on hypotension after anesthetic induction in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Anesth. 2024;9 doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111580. Published online August. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen D., Liao M., Wu X.R., Zhao T.Y., Sun H. Comparison of efficacy and safety of equivalent doses of remimazolam versus propofol for gastroscopy anesthesia in elderly patients. Sci. Rep. 2024;14(1):7645. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58294-2. Published 2024 Apr 1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources