ERN eUROGEN Guidelines on the Management of Anorectal Malformations Part I: Diagnostics
- PMID: 39393414
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791250
ERN eUROGEN Guidelines on the Management of Anorectal Malformations Part I: Diagnostics
Abstract
Introduction: Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are rare congenital anomalies that involve the anus, rectum, and oftentimes the genitourinary tract. The management of ARM patients is complex, and many controversies exist. To address this issue, the European Reference Network eUROGEN for rare and complex urogenital conditions aimed to develop comprehensive guidelines for the management of ARM.
Methods: The Dutch Quality Standard for ARM served as the basis for the development of guidelines applicable on a European level. Literature was searched in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. The ADAPTE method was utilized to incorporate the newest available evidence. A panel of 15 experts from 7 European countries assessed currency, acceptability, and applicability of recommendations. Recommendations from the Dutch Quality Standard were adapted, adopted, or rejected, and recommendations were formed considering current evidence and/or expert consensus.
Results: Prenatal and neonatal diagnostic workup as well as postsurgical follow-up of anorectal, genitourinary tract, and neurologic system were reviewed. Seven new studies were identified. The panel adapted 13 recommendations, adopted 7, and developed 8 de novo. The availability of high-quality evidence was limited, and most recommendations were based on retrospective studies, case series, or expert opinion.
Conclusion: Patients with ARM and their families require highly specialized and comprehensive care from the prenatal period to adulthood. This guideline provides recommendations for a comprehensive diagnostic workup of children with ARM throughout their life that is applicable on a European level.
Thieme. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
We would like to disclose that two of the authors of this adaptation report (I.D.B., C.E.J.S.) were also authors of the Dutch Quality Standard. However, it is important to note that neither I.D.B. nor C.E.J.S. has any conflict of interest to declare and they did not advocate for any particular viewpoints or positions in relation to the content of the Dutch Quality Standard. No conflicting interests were declared from the other authors.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources