Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Dec;43(6):101436.
doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101436. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

Opioid free versus opioid sparing strategies for multimodal antinociception during laparoscopic colectomy: a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Opioid free versus opioid sparing strategies for multimodal antinociception during laparoscopic colectomy: a randomised controlled trial

Vincent Collange et al. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: It remains unclear whether opioid-free anesthesia (OFA), when compared to opioid-sparing anesthesia (OSA), reduces postoperative opioid consumption while still providing adequate pain control. We thus tested the hypothesis that patients having an OFA strategy during laparoscopic colectomy would require less postoperative opioids when compared to an OSA strategy.

Methods: This single-center, prospective randomized controlled superiority trial, randomly allocated consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy to receive either sevoflurane-dexmedetomidine anesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine (OFA group) or sevoflurane-sufentanil boluses anesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine (OSA group). Both groups received multimodal antinociception with boluses of dexamethasone, lidocaine, and ketamine during anesthesia induction, as well as acetaminophen, ketoprofen, and nefopam before the end of the surgery. OFA patients also received a dose of magnesium sulfate during induction. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption at 48 h after surgery, expressed in oral morphine equivalents (OME). Secondary exploratory outcomes were pain scores, opioid-related adverse events, and patient quality of life (WHODAS score).

Results: Of the 160 randomized patients, 155 were included in a modified intention-to-treat analysis. Median [Q1-Q3] OME consumption at 48 h after surgery did not differ between groups (9 [0-30] mg for OFA vs. 14 [0-30] mg for OSA; p = 0.861). Key secondary outcomes were not different between groups except a three time higher incidence of bradycardia in the OFA group.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy with a multimodal antinociception protocol, OFA, when compared to OSA, did not decrease postoperative opioid consumption.

Clinical trial registry and number: NCT05031234.

Keywords: Dexmedetomidine; ERAS; Hypoxemia; Nausea; Nociception; Pain; Sufentanil; Vomiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest Alexandre Joosten is consultant for Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA. Sean Coekelenbergh has received honoraria for presentations from Medtronic, Medasense, and Med—Storm. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources