Clinical characteristics and outcomes of preterm versus term uterine rupture: a nationwide observational study
- PMID: 39394460
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07762-1
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of preterm versus term uterine rupture: a nationwide observational study
Abstract
Objective: To assess and compare the clinical aspects of uterine rupture by dividing the gestational age at uterine rupture occurrence into < 37-week (preterm) and ≥ 37-week (term) groups.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 187 acute-care hospitals across Japan and included patients who experienced uterine rupture. Data were sourced from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database, spanning July 2010 to March 2022. The patients' characteristics, in-hospital procedures, and outcomes were compared between those with uterine rupture at < 37 and ≥ 37 weeks of gestation. The main outcomes were hysterectomy, complications, proportion of blood transfusions, and postoperative length of stay.
Results: A total of 298 patients were identified, with 161 in the preterm group and 137 in the term group. Placenta accreta spectrum occurred more frequently in the preterm group than in the term group (18.0% vs. 6.6%, respectively; P = 0.003). Vacuum delivery (19.0% vs. 0.6%, P < 0.001) and uterine fundal pressure (2.9% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.004) were more likely to be applied in the term group. The maternal need for mechanical ventilation (26.3% vs. 12.4%, P = 0.003), the proportion of disseminated intravascular coagulation (40.1% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.009), and the requirement for platelet transfusions (32.8% vs. 15.5%, P < 0.001) were greater in the term. The postoperative hospital stays were also longer in the term group.
Conclusion: This study shows that individual characteristics vary with the gestational age at uterine rupture, and maternal morbidity is notably higher in term compared to preterm ruptures.
Keywords: Blood transfusion; Complication; Database; Gestational age; Hysterectomy; Term birth; Uterine diseases.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors report no conflict of interest. Ethics approval: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of The University of Tokyo [approval number: 3501-(5) (19 May 2021)]. The requirement for informed consent was waived because all data were de-identified. Consent to participate: Written informed consent was not obtained to the study design.
Similar articles
-
In-hospital outcomes of repair and hysterectomy for uterine rupture: A nationwide observational study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Nov;302:196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.010. Epub 2024 Sep 12. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024. PMID: 39298829
-
[Clinical analysis of 12 cases of spontaneous uterine rupture caused by placenta percreta].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 25;55(10):691-696. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20200430-00373. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 33120481 Chinese.
-
Placenta Accreta Spectrum Treatment With Intraoperative Multivessel Embolization: the PASTIME protocol.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;225(4):442.e1-442.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Jul 7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 34245679
-
Assessment of placenta accreta spectrum at vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Oct;5(10):101115. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101115. Epub 2023 Aug 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023. PMID: 37543142
-
Emergency delivery in pregnancies at high probability of placenta accreta spectrum on prenatal imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Oct;6(10):101432. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101432. Epub 2024 Jul 26. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024. PMID: 39069207
References
-
- Hofmeyr GJ, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM (2005) WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. BJOG 112(9):1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00725.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Amikam U, Hochberg A, Segal R, Abramov S, Lavie A, Yogev Y et al (2023) Perinatal outcomes following uterine rupture during a trial of labor after cesarean: a 12-year single-center experience. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15178 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Finnsdottir SK, Maghsoudlou P, Pepin K, Gu X, Carusi DA, Einarsson JI et al (2023) Uterine rupture and factors associated with adverse outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 308(4):1271–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06820-w - DOI - PubMed
-
- Al-Zirqi I, Daltveit AK, Forsén L, Stray-Pedersen B, Vangen S (2017) Risk factors for complete uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol 216(2):165.e1-.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.017 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Forsén L, Vangen S (2010) Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section. BJOG 117(7):809–820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02533.x - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources