Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 11;22(1):449.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03606-6.

Microbiome-derived metabolites in early to mid-pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes: a metabolome-wide association study

Affiliations

Microbiome-derived metabolites in early to mid-pregnancy and risk of gestational diabetes: a metabolome-wide association study

Sita Manasa Susarla et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: Pre-diagnostic disturbances in the microbiome-derived metabolome have been associated with an increased risk of diabetes in non-pregnant populations. However, the roles of microbiome-derived metabolites, the end-products of microbial metabolism, in gestational diabetes (GDM) remain understudied. We examined the prospective association of microbiome-derived metabolites in early to mid-pregnancy with GDM risk in a diverse population.

Methods: We conducted a prospective discovery and validation study, including a case-control sample of 91 GDM and 180 non-GDM individuals within the multi-racial/ethnic The Pregnancy Environment and Lifestyle Study (PETALS) as the discovery set, a random sample from the PETALS (42 GDM, 372 non-GDM) as validation set 1, and a case-control sample (35 GDM, 70 non-GDM) from the Gestational Weight Gain and Optimal Wellness randomized controlled trial as validation set 2. We measured untargeted fasting serum metabolomics at gestational weeks (GW) 10-13 and 16-19 by gas chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF-MS), liquid chromatography (LC)/quadrupole TOF-MS, and hydrophilic interaction LC/quadrupole TOF-MS. GDM was diagnosed using the 3-h, 100-g oral glucose tolerance test according to the Carpenter-Coustan criteria around GW 24-28.

Results: Among 1362 annotated compounds, we identified 140 of gut microbiome metabolism origin. Multivariate enrichment analysis illustrated that carbocyclic acids and branched-chain amino acid clusters at GW 10-13 and the unsaturated fatty acids cluster at GW 16-19 were positively associated with GDM risk (FDR < 0.05). At GW 10-13, the prediction model that combined conventional risk factors and LASSO-selected microbiome-derived metabolites significantly outperformed the model with only conventional risk factors including fasting glucose (discovery AUC: 0.884 vs. 0.691; validation 1: 0.945 vs. 0.731; validation 2: 0.987 vs. 0.717; all P < 0.01). At GW 16-19, similar results were observed (discovery AUC: 0.802 vs. 0.691, P < 0.01; validation 1: 0.826 vs. 0.780; P = 0.10).

Conclusions: Dysbiosis in microbiome-derived metabolites is present early in pregnancy among individuals progressing to GDM.

Keywords: Gestational diabetes; Metabolomics; Microbiome; Pregnancy; Risk prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart for discovery set and validation sets 1 and 2
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ChemRICH plots depicting the pathways and key metabolites significantly associated with risk of gestational diabetes. A 10–13 weeks and (B) 16–19 weeks of gestation. *P-value for pathway <0.05 after false discovery rate adjustment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Incremental prediction value of multi-metabolite panels beyond conventional risk factors for gestational diabetes. A 10–13 weeks and (B) 16–19 weeks of gestation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) statistics were estimated without cross-validation for GDM risk prediction using conventional risk factors (age at delivery, race/ethnicity, pre-pregnancy body mass index, nulliparity, pre-existing hypertension, family history of diabetes, gestational age and fasting status at the respective clinic visit, and fasting serum glucose values; Model 1, red curves); a multi-metabolite panel (Model 2, green curves) selected by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression at (A) 10–13 weeks and (B) 16–19 weeks of gestation; and the selected multi-metabolite panel in addition to conventional risk factors (Model 3, blue curves). P values for differences in AUC statistics between models were derived by DeLong’s test

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhu Y, Zhang C. Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: a global perspective. Curr DiabRep. 2016;16(1):7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shah NS, Wang MC, Freaney PM, Perak AM, Carnethon MR, Kandula NR, et al. Trends in gestational diabetes at first live birth by race and ethnicity in the US, 2011–2019. JAMA. 2021;326(7):660–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landon MB, Gabbe SG. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstetr Gynecol. 2011;118:6. - PubMed
    1. Fiehn O. Metabolomics – the link between genotypes and phenotypes. Plant Mol Biol. 2002;48(1):155–71. - PubMed
    1. Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW, Knight R. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell. 2012;148(6):1258–70. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types