Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 11;24(1):1129.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06088-5.

Development of a self-assessment tool to evaluate the readiness of pharmacy departments for internship training in China: a two-phase study

Affiliations

Development of a self-assessment tool to evaluate the readiness of pharmacy departments for internship training in China: a two-phase study

Huitao Huang et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Objectives: Internships in the pharmacy departments of training hospitals represent a crucial stage in the professional development of pharmacy students. However, the quality of internship training varies significantly across training hospitals in China, and there is a lack of standardized readiness evaluation tools. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a self-assessment tool to evaluate the preparedness of training hospitals for providing internship training.

Methods: This study employed an exploratory mixed-methods approach and was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, during 2021, focus groups were conducted with 16 interns from three tertiary hospitals in Henan Province. In 2022, 14 preceptors from tertiary hospitals in various provinces were interviewed either one-on-one or in focus groups. The interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis to compile a set of self-assessment indicators for internship training readiness. Subsequently, the initial draft of the self-assessment tool for internship training readiness was developed by integrating the indicators derived from the interviews and literature review. In the second phase, the Delphi method was utilized. In 2023, the experts participated in two rounds of correspondence (21 experts in the first round and 19 in the second round), and consensus was reached on the indicators of the self-assessment tool after the two rounds. Meanwhile, these experts assessed the current status of internship training in training hospitals across China.

Results: The qualitative findings of the first phase included five themes and 22 sub-themes, which were integrated with the indicators derived from the literature review to develop an initial indicator framework for the second phase. This initial framework comprised five domains and 37 items. The second phase involved two rounds of expert surveys, with effective response rates of 90.48% and 89.47%, respectively. Ultimately, the self-assessment tool for evaluating the readiness of pharmacy departments in training hospitals for internships included five dimensions and 35 secondary indicators: (1) organizational structure, (2) training content, (3) training mode, (4) effectiveness evaluation, and (5) emergency management. Additionally, experts assessed the readiness of pharmacy departments in Chinese training hospitals for internships, yielding varied results. Emergency management preparedness scored the highest, followed by organizational structure and training content preparation. However, the modes of internship training and the evaluation of training effectiveness received lower scores.

Conclusion: The developed tool provides a comprehensive self-assessment checklist for the pharmacy departments of training hospitals and possesses the potential to enhance the development of more effective internship training programs.

Keywords: Internship; Mixed method study; Readiness; Training hospital.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Research methodology
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Themes and subthemes from the first phase of qualitative research
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Experts’ ratings on the importance of the internship training indicators and the current status of the training hospitals. X denotes the average of the experts’ importance ratings for each indicator. Y denotes the average of the experts’ ratings on the readiness to train the internship

Similar articles

References

    1. Gimeno-Jorda M J, Gimenez-Poderos T, Negro-Vega E, et al. Evaluation of specialized training in hospital pharmacy[J]. Farm Hosp. 2020;44(5):198–211. - PubMed
    1. Steeb D R, Zeeman J M, Bush A A, et al. Exploring career development through a student-directed practicum to provide individualized learning experiences[J]. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021;13(5):500–5. - PubMed
    1. Abublan RS, Nazer L H, Jaddoua S M, et al. A hospital-based Pharmacy Internship Program in Jordan[J]. Am J Pharm Educ. 2019;83(3):6547. - PMC - PubMed
    1. El-Lababidi R, Osman F. Outcomes of a pharmacy internship program at a Quaternary Care Hospital[J]. Farm Hosp. 2022;46(4):251–5. - PubMed
    1. Hou J, Michaud C, LI Z, et al. Transformation of the education of health professionals in China: progress and challenges[J]. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):819–27. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources