Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 13;53(6):dyae135.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyae135.

Probabilistic bias analysis for exposure misclassification of household income by neighbourhood in a cohort of individuals with colorectal cancer

Affiliations

Probabilistic bias analysis for exposure misclassification of household income by neighbourhood in a cohort of individuals with colorectal cancer

Laura E Davis et al. Int J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Despite poor agreement, neighbourhood income is used as a proxy for household income, due to a lack of data availability. We quantified misclassification between household and neighbourhood income and demonstrate quantitative bias analysis (QBA) in scenarios where only neighbourhood income is available in assessing income inequalities on colorectal cancer mortality.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of adults with colorectal cancer diagnosed 2006-14 from Statistics Canada's Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort. Neighbourhood income quintiles from Statistics Canada were used. Census household income quintiles were used to determine bias parameters and confirm results of the QBA. We calculated positive and negative predictive values using multinomial models, adjusting for age, sex and rural residence. Probabilistic QBA was conducted to explore the implication of exposure misclassification when estimating the effect of income on 5-year mortality.

Results: We found poor agreement between neighbourhood and household income: positive predictive values ranged from 21% to 37%. The bias-adjusted risk of neighbourhood income on 5-year mortality was similar to the risk of mortality by household income. The bias-adjusted relative risk of the lowest income quintile compared with the highest was 1.42 [95% simulation interval (SI) 1.32-1.53] compared with 1.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39-1.54] for household income and 1.18 (95% CI 1.12-1.24) for neighbourhood income.

Conclusion: QBA can be used to estimate adjusted effects of neighbourhood income on mortality which represent household income. The predictive values from our study can be applied to similar cohorts with only neighbourhood income to estimate the effects of household income on cancer mortality.

Keywords: Area-level income; cancer; colorectal cancer; exposure misclassification; household income; income inequalities; individual income; neighbourhood income; quantitative bias analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cohort creation. CanCHEC, Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohorts; CRC, Colorectal cancer; PCCF+, Postal code conversation file plus
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Analysis steps. PPVs, Positive predictive values; NPVs, Negative predictive values; QBA, quantitative bias analysis; RR, relative risk
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Proportion of those who died within 5 years by household and neighbourhood income quintiles. Quintile 1 = lowest income; Quintile 5 = highest income
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Unadjusted (left) and adjusted (right) bias-adjusted relative risks of death within five years (yes/no) with systematic and random error and 95% simulation intervals for all of Canada, compared with the relative risk of death for true household income and measured neighbourhood income. The reference category is the highest income quintile for all comparisons (quintile 5). QBA, Quantitative bias analysis

Similar articles

References

    1. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP.. Socioeconomic determinants of health : health and social cohesion: why care about income inequality? BMJ 1997;314:1037–40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marmot MG. Understanding social inequalities in health. Perspect Biol Med 2003;46:S9–23. - PubMed
    1. DeRouen MC, Hu L, McKinley M. et al. Incidence of lung cancer histologic cell-types according to neighborhood factors: a population based study in California. PLoS One 2018;13:e0197146. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeRouen MC, Schupp CW, Koo J. et al. Impact of individual and neighborhood factors on disparities in prostate cancer survival. Cancer Epidemiol 2018;53:1–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moss JL, Johnson NJ, Yu M, Altekruse SF, Cronin KA.. Comparisons of individual- and area-level socioeconomic status as proxies for individual-level measures: evidence from the Mortality Disparities in American Communities study. Popul Health Metr 2021;19:1. - PMC - PubMed