Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Dec:151:105388.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105388. Epub 2024 Oct 11.

Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for approximal caries on bitewing radiographs: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for approximal caries on bitewing radiographs: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Bruna Katherine Guimarães Carvalho et al. J Dent. 2024 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for approximal carious lesions on bitewing radiographs.

Methods: This study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) reporting on the diagnostic accuracy of AI for approximal carious lesions on bitewing radiographs. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. A systematic search was conducted on November 4, 2023, in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases and an updated search was performed on August 28, 2024. The primary outcomes assessed were sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using a bivariate model.

Results: Of the 2,442 studies identified, 21 met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AI were 0.94 (confidence interval (CI): ± 0.78-0.99) and 0.91 (CI: ± 0.84-0.95), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) ranged from 0.15 to 0.87, indicating a moderate capacity for identifying true positives among decayed teeth. The negative predictive value (NPV) ranged from 0.79 to 1.00, demonstrating a high ability to exclude healthy teeth. The diagnostic odds ratio was high, indicating strong overall diagnostic performance.

Conclusions: AI models demonstrate clinically acceptable diagnostic accuracy for approximal caries on bitewing radiographs. Although AI can be valuable for preliminary screening, positive findings should be verified by dental experts to prevent unnecessary treatments and ensure timely diagnosis. AI models are highly reliable in excluding healthy approximal surfaces.

Clinical significance: AI can assist dentists in detecting approximal caries on bitewing radiographs. However, expert supervision is required to prevent iatrogenic damage and ensure timely diagnosis.

Keywords: Approximal caries; Artificial intelligence; Bitewing radiographs; Convolutional neural network.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

LinkOut - more resources