Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Oct 14:30:e945227.
doi: 10.12659/MSM.945227.

Evaluation of Neuromuscular Blockade: A Comparative Study of TOF-Cuff® on the Lower Leg and TOF-Scan® on the Ulnar Nerve During Mivacurium Anesthesia

Affiliations
Observational Study

Evaluation of Neuromuscular Blockade: A Comparative Study of TOF-Cuff® on the Lower Leg and TOF-Scan® on the Ulnar Nerve During Mivacurium Anesthesia

Paweł Radkowski et al. Med Sci Monit. .

Abstract

BACKGROUND To evaluate neuromuscular monitoring during anesthesia with mivacurium, this study assessed the correlation between measurements of TOF-Cuff® placed on the lower leg and stimulating the tibial nerve and TOF-Scan® values from the adductor pollicis muscle. Additionally, systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBO) blood pressure measured in both locations were compared. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty-six patients participated in this observational clinical trial. The TOF-Cuff® was placed on the lower leg and the TOF-Scan® was placed on the thumb. Train-of-four (TOF) values were recorded simultaneously by both devices at 30-second intervals before intubation. Measurements continued every 5 minutes until extubation. Bland-Altman analyses compared TOF values obtained from the 2 devices. RESULTS Time to onset and relaxation time did not differ significantly; the number of patients presenting a lack of blockade despite TOF=0 was also concordant. The time from the last dose of mivacurium to TOF ratio >90 was shorter on the leg than on hand (median 20 [5-28, 0-65] min vs 30 [20-35, 0-60] min, p=0.025). The median (range, interquartile range) difference between measurements was: 11.6 (-41 to 45, 2-19) for SBP and -8 (-28 to 26, -15 to -4) for DBP at baseline (p=0.0495); 5 (-53 to 55, -2 to 9) for SBP and -11 (-45 to 29, -19 to -5) (p=0.0017) for DBP during the blockade. CONCLUSIONS Time-to-onset and SBP are comparable between these 2 methods, in contrast to time-to-recovery and diastolic blood pressure, and this should be considered in case of the inability to apply the TOF-Cuff on the leg.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Kaplan-Meyer curve presenting time to onset of neuromuscular blockade after the first dose of mivacurium.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Bland-Altmann plot for the time to onset of neuromuscular blockade (train-of-four ratio=0) after the first dose of mivacurium. (B) Bland-Altmann plot for the time to recovery (train-of-four ratio >90) after the last dose of mivacurium.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A–D) Bland-Altman plot for values of systolic and diastolic blood pressure measured on the arms and on lower legs at the starting point and during neuromuscular blockade.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of Spearman R correlation coefficient between series of measurements of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in particular patients. Measurements were performed with TOF-Cuff on the legs and Drager Infinity Delta XL on the forearm of the hand where TOF-Scan was placed on the finger. TOF – train-of-four.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Motamed C. Intraoperative monitoring of neuromuscular blockade. Life (Basel) 2023;13(5):1184. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Markle A, Graf N, Horn K, et al. Neuromuscular monitoring using TOF-Cuff® versus TOF-Scan®: An observational study under clinical anesthesia conditions. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020;86(7):704–11. - PubMed
    1. Iwasaki H, Nemes R, Brull SJ, et al. Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring: Current devices, new technological advances, and use in clinical practice. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2018;8:134–44.
    1. Murphy GS. Neuromuscular monitoring in the perioperative period. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(2):464–68. - PubMed
    1. Markle A, Graf N, Horn K, et al. Neuromuscular monitoring using TOF-Cuff® versus TOF-Scan®: An observational study under clinical anesthesia conditions. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020;86(7):704–11. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources