Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2024 Sep 23:2024.09.20.24314078.
doi: 10.1101/2024.09.20.24314078.

Drinking motives and alcohol sensitivity mediate multi-dimensional genetic influences on alcohol use behaviors

Jeanne E Savage  1 ; Spit for Science Working Group; Danielle M Dick  2 , Danielle Posthuma  1   3
Affiliations

Drinking motives and alcohol sensitivity mediate multi-dimensional genetic influences on alcohol use behaviors

Jeanne E Savage et al. medRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Background: Genetic influences account for a substantial proportion of individual differences in alcohol use behaviors (AUBs). However, multiple distinct sets of genes are linked to different AUBs, which may explain their dramatic variability in risk factors and manifestations. In this study, we explore whether intermediate neurobiological traits and alcohol-related cognitions mediate the relationship between polygenic scores (PGS) and multiple AUBs, with the aim to better understand processes captured by different genetic profiles.

Methods: Using results from prior genome-wide association studies, we derived PGS for 6 AUBs in participants from Spit for Science, a longitudinal study of college students in the U.S. (n=4,549). Self-report measures included personality traits, alcohol expectancies, drinking motivations, and alcohol sensitivity measures as well as drinking frequency, drinking quantity, alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms, and maximum drinks in 24 hours. Using linear regression and multiple mediation models, we investigated the direct and indirect effects of PGS on AUBs.

Results: In univariable regression results, PGSs indexing broad AUB dimensions such as drinks per week (DPW) and AUD predicted higher levels of sensation-seeking and multiple drinking motives, while BeerPref PGSs (indexing a variable pattern of alcohol problems associated with a preference for beer) predicted higher negative urgency and lower alcohol sensitivity. Mediational models indicated strong direct and indirect effects of DPW PGSs on multiple AUBs via social/enhancement drinking motives and alcohol sensitivity, indirect effects of AUD PGSs on AUD symptoms via coping motives, and indirect effects of BeerPref PGS on all AUBs via the joint effect of mediators including alcohol sensitivity.

Conclusions: These findings provide initial evidence that the genetic influences on different AUBs are associated with and partially mediated by intermediate neurobiological and cognitive factors, which may be more amenable to intervention. Greater focus on drinking motives and alcohol sensitivity is warranted in genetic research, as well as attention to the heterogeneous pathways linking genes to alcohol use outcomes.

Keywords: drinking motives; genetic heterogeneity; level of response to alcohol; mediation; polygenic scores.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors report no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example diagram of the multiple mediation model linking polygenic scores to alcohol use behaviors. Solid lines represent direct effects and dashed lines indirect effects. Single-headed arrows represent directional association pathways and double-headed arrows represent correlations.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. ADAMS Z. W., KAISER A. J., LYNAM D. R., CHARNIGO R. J. & MILICH R. 2012. Drinking motives as mediators of the impulsivity-substance use relation: pathways for negative urgency, lack of premeditation, and sensation seeking. Addict Behav, 37, 848–55. - PMC - PubMed
    1. AGRAWAL A., DICK D. M., BUCHOLZ K. K., MADDEN P. A., COOPER M. L., SHER K. J. & HEATH A. C. 2008. Drinking expectancies and motives: a genetic study of young adult women. Addiction, 103, 194–204. - PubMed
    1. AGRAWAL A., FREEDMAN N. D., CHENG Y. C., LIN P., SHAFFER J. R., SUN Q., TAYLOR K., YASPAN B., COLE J. W., CORNELIS M. C., DESENSI R. S., FITZPATRICK A., HEISS G., KANG J. H., O’CONNELL J., BENNETT S., BOOKMAN E., BUCHOLZ K. K., CAPORASO N., CROUT R., DICK D. M., EDENBERG H. J., GOATE A., HESSELBROCK V., KITTNER S., KRAMER J., NURNBERGER J. I. JR., QI L., RICE J. P., SCHUCKIT M., VAN DAM R. M., BOERWINKLE E., HU F., LEVY S., MARAZITA M., MITCHELL B. D., PASQUALE L. R. & BIERUT L. J. 2012. Measuring alcohol consumption for genomic meta-analyses of alcohol intake: opportunities and challenges. Am J Clin Nutr, 95, 539–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. BOHN M. J., BABOR T. F. & KRANZLER H. R. 1995. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): validation of a screening instrument for use in medical settings. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 56, 423–432. - PubMed
    1. BRESIN K. & MEKAWI Y. 2021. The “Why” of Drinking Matters: A Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Drinking Motives and Drinking Outcomes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res, 45, 38–50. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources