Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024;6(1):89.
doi: 10.1186/s43014-024-00264-2. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

Degree of food processing and breast cancer risk: a prospective study in 9 European countries

Affiliations

Degree of food processing and breast cancer risk: a prospective study in 9 European countries

Manon Cairat et al. Food Prod Process Nutr. 2024.

Abstract

Recent epidemiological studies have suggested a positive association between ultra-processed food consumption and breast cancer risk, although some studies also reported no association. Furthermore, the evidence regarding the associations between intake of food with lower degrees of processing and breast cancer risk is limited. Thus, we investigated the associations between dietary intake by degree of food processing and breast cancer risk, overall and by breast cancer subtypes in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Dietary intake of EPIC participants was assessed via questionnaires at baseline. More than 11,000 food ingredients were classified into four groups of food processing levels using the NOVA classification system: unprocessed/minimally processed (NOVA 1), culinary ingredients (NOVA 2), processed (NOVA 3) and ultra-processed (NOVA 4). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of breast cancer per standard deviation increase in daily consumption (grams) of foods from each NOVA group. The current analysis included 14,933 breast cancer cases, diagnosed among the 318,686 EPIC female participants, (median follow-up of 14.9 years). No associations were found between breast cancer risk and the level of dietary intake from NOVA 1 [HR per 1 SD=0.99 (95% CI 0.97 - 1.01)], NOVA 2 [HR per 1 SD =1.01 (95% CI 0.98 - 1.03)] and NOVA 4 [HR per 1 SD =1.01 (95% CI 0.99 - 1.03)] foods. However, a positive association was found between NOVA 3 and breast cancer risk [HR per 1 SD =1.05 (95% CI 1.03 - 1.07)] which became non-significant after adjustment for alcohol intake [HR per 1 SD =1.01 (95% CI 0.98 - 1.05)] or when beer and wine were excluded from this group [HR per 1 SD =0.99 (95% CI 0.97 - 1.01)]. The associations did not differ by breast cancer subtype, menopausal status or body mass index. Findings from this large-scale prospective study suggest that the positive association between processed food intake and breast cancer risk was likely driven by alcoholic beverage consumption.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43014-024-00264-2.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Epidemiology; Food processing; NOVA classification; Prospective study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Adams, J., & White, M. (2015). Characterisation of UK diets according to degree of food processing and associations with socio-demographics and obesity: cross-sectional analysis of UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008–12). International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.,12(1), 160. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakker, M. F., Peeters, P. H., Klaasen, V. M., Bueno-de-Mesquita, H. B., Jansen, E. H., Ros, M. M., et al. (2016). Plasma carotenoids, vitamin C, tocopherols, and retinol and the risk of breast cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition,103(2), 454–64. - PubMed
    1. Bleiweiss-Sande, R., Chui, K., Evans, E. W., Goldberg, J., Amin, S., & Sacheck, J. (2019). Robustness of Food Processing Classification Systems. Nutrients,11(6), 1344. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang, K., Gunter, M. J., Rauber, F., Levy, R. B., Huybrechts, I., Kliemann, N., et al. (2023). Ultra-processed food consumption, cancer risk and cancer mortality: a large-scale prospective analysis within the UK Biobank. EClinicalMedicine,56, 101840. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clarke R, Shipley M, Lewington S, Youngman L, Collins R, Marmot M, et al. (1999) Underestimation of risk associations due to regression dilution in long-term follow-up of prospective studies. American Journal Of Epidemiology;150(4):341‑53. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources