Viral and Symptom Rebound Following Anti-Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
- PMID: 39400063
- PMCID: PMC11793053
- DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiae501
Viral and Symptom Rebound Following Anti-Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Monoclonal Antibody Therapy in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
Abstract
We explored viral and symptom rebound after coronavirus disease 2019 amubarvimab-romlusevimab monoclonal antibody therapy versus placebo in the randomized ACTIV-2/A5401 trial. Participants underwent nasal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 polymerase chain reaction testing at study days 3, 7, 14, and 28. Viral rebound was defined as RNA ≥3 and ≥0.5 log10 copies/mL increase from day 3 or 7, and symptom rebound as hospitalization or any moderate/severe symptom for ≥2 days after initial symptom improvement. There was no difference in viral rebound (∼5%/arm) (analysis population n = 713) or symptom rebound among participants who initially improved (hazard ratio, 0.95 [95% confidence interval, .52-1.75]; analysis population n = 574); <1% had both viral/symptom rebound.
Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; monoclonal antibodies; nonhospitalized adults; symptom rebound; viral rebound.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
Conflict of interest statement
Potential conflicts of interest. K. W. C. has served as a consultant for Pardes Biosciences. J. Z. L. has received research support to his institution from Merck and consulted for AbbVie. T. H. E. serves as a consultant for Tonix Pharmaceuticals. D. A. W. has received funding to his institution to support research and honoraria for advisory boards and consulting from Gilead Sciences. D. M. is an employee and shareholder of Brii Biosciences. J. J. E. is an ad hoc consultant to GSK/VIR and has consulted for Merck, and is on the data monitoring committee and chair for Adagio (now Invivyd) phase 3 studies. J. S. C. has consulted for Merck and Company. E. S. D. receives consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, Theratechnologies, and GSK/ViiV and research support through his institution from Gilead Sciences and GSK/ViiV. D. M. S. has consulted for the following companies: Fluxergy, Gilead, Linear Therapies, VxBiosciences, Model Medicines, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Lucira, Pharma Holdings, Hyundai, and Red Queen Therapeutics, and received support for attending meetings and/or travel from A2 Bio. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Figures
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
