Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;47(12):1593-1603.
doi: 10.1111/pace.15087. Epub 2024 Oct 13.

Caught in the Act: A Detailed Analysis of Cardiac Event Monitoring in a Cohort of Pediatric and ACHD Patients

Ashwin Srivatsav  1 , Zachery J Thompson  1 , Michael A Bruno  2 , Sara B Stephens  2 , Maria Elena Gutierrez  2 , Christina Y Miyake  2 , Shaine A Morris  2 , Tam Dan Pham  2 , Santiago O Valdes  2 , Jeffrey J Kim  2 , Taylor S Howard  2
Affiliations

Caught in the Act: A Detailed Analysis of Cardiac Event Monitoring in a Cohort of Pediatric and ACHD Patients

Ashwin Srivatsav et al. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Event monitors are being increasingly used in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients for arrhythmia evaluation. Data on their diagnostic yield are limited.

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of event monitors, patient characteristics associated with critical events, and clinical response to events.

Methods: We retrospectively assessed event monitors prescribed to patients at our institution's Heart Center from 2017 to 2020. Thirty-day event monitor tracings were reviewed by an electrophysiologist (EP) to identify critical events defined as supraventricular tachycardia (SVT, re-entrant, atrial tachycardia, atrial flutter, and atrial fibrillation), ventricular tachycardia (VT), atrioventricular block, and pauses greater than 3 s. Patient characteristics and treatment data were collected. Characteristics associated with events were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Trends in monitor prescription over time, diagnostic yield, and clinical response to events were analyzed.

Results: 204/2330 (8.8%) event monitors had EP-confirmed critical events. Critical events included SVT (51.5%), VT (38.5%), atrioventricular block (4%), and pauses (6%). 129/198 (65%) patients with critical events underwent treatment. Event monitoring usage increased by 52% between 2017 and 2020 (p < 0.0001). Complex CHD (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4, p = 0.004), cardiomyopathy (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-4.8, p < 0.001), and EP-ordered monitors (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.1, p = 0.001) were more highly associated with critical events.

Conclusion: Event monitor use is common, and critical events were captured in 8.8% of patients. The majority of patients with critical events underwent treatment. Factors associated with critical events include EPs as ordering providers, complex CHD, and cardiomyopathy.

Keywords: arrhythmia; event monitor; pediatric.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. V. L. Zeigler, “Supraventricular Tachycardia in Children: A Challenge for Pediatric Nurses,” Journal of Pediatric Nursing 9, no. 5 (1994): 288–298.
    1. C. Ayabakan, S. Ozer, A. Celiker, and S. Ozme, “Analysis of 2017 Holter Records in Pediatric Patients,” Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 42, no. 4 (2000): 286–293.
    1. E. P. Walsh, “Arrhythmias in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease,” Cardiac Electrophysiology Review 6, no. 4 (2002): 422–430.
    1. R. A. Hegazy and W. N. Lotfy, “The Value of Holter Monitoring in the Assessment of Pediatric Patients,” Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal 7, no. 4 (2007): 204–214.
    1. R. Aman, A. U. Qureshi, and M. Sadiq, “Yield of 48‐Hour Holter Monitoring in Children With Unexplained Palpitations and Significance of Associated Symptoms,” JPMA: Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 67, no. 7 (2017): 975–979.

LinkOut - more resources