Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov;19(6):e12658.
doi: 10.1111/opn.12658.

Perception of Utility and Efficacy of Implementation of TEC-MED Model of Care for Frail Older People and Their Caregivers: A Qualitative Study

Affiliations

Perception of Utility and Efficacy of Implementation of TEC-MED Model of Care for Frail Older People and Their Caregivers: A Qualitative Study

Marzia Lommi et al. Int J Older People Nurs. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: The global population is ageing, and healthcare systems continue to adopt outdated social models of ageing that do not respond to older people's needs. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of participants in the implementation of the Transcultural social-ethical-care (TEC-MED) model for integrated community care.

Methods: A qualitative descriptive research study was conducted. Qualitative data were collected through individual interviews and focus groups with purposive sampling.

Results: We gathered experiences from five older people, five informal caregivers, two training agents (nurses), six healthcare professionals and eight stakeholders (senior management of businesses, public administrators, researchers and educators). Four themes were extracted: TEC-MED as a new model of home care, TEC-MED model outcome, key role of training agent and platform and resources. Overall, all the participants were satisfied with the model and various positive outcomes were found. The TEC-MED model of care was inclusive and personalised and bridged the communication and integration gaps between different services for the care of dependent older people and their caregivers in the community. Recommendations were made for improvements to the model.

Conclusion: New models of care that are inclusive, personalised and integrated are necessary to respond to the multiple needs of the older people. A model that integrates the multiple skills of healthcare professionals is an optimum solution in the care of the older people and their caregivers in Mediterranean countries. Similar research is imperative for other healthcare systems to help them prepare adequately to respond effectively to the needs of present and new generations of older people.

Implications for practice: The TEC-MED model presents a promising approach to addressing the complex care needs of older people and their caregivers by fostering inclusivity, personalisation and integration across services. For nursing practice, this model emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration and the role of nurses in facilitating the adoption of new care strategies. Implementing such models in everyday practice could improve the quality of care provided to older adults, enhancing communication between healthcare providers and ensuring that care is more aligned with the individual needs of patients. Furthermore, integrating digital platforms and targeted resources, as highlighted in the TEC-MED model, can aid in overcoming existing barriers in healthcare systems, improving the coordination of care at the community level.

Keywords: TEC‐MED model; care pathways; caregivers; chronic diseases; nurses; older people; qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Abdi, S., A. Spann, J. Borilovic, L. de Witte, and M. Hawley. 2019. “Understanding the Care and Support Needs of Older People: A Scoping Review and Categorisation Using the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework (ICF).” BMC Geriatrics 19, no. 1: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877‐019‐1189‐9.
    1. Akgun‐Citak, E., S. Attepe‐Ozden, A. v. Vaskelyte, et al. 2020. “Challenges and Needs of Informal Caregivers in Elderly Care: Qualitative Research in Four European Countries, the TRACE Project.” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 87: 103971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2019.103971.
    1. Arcury, T. A., J. C. Sandberg, K. P. Melius, et al. 2020. “Older Adult Internet Use and eHealth Literacy.” Journal of Applied Gerontology 39, no. 2: 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464818807468.
    1. Berwick, D., and D. M. Fox. 2016. “‘Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care’: Donabedian's Classic Article 50 Years Later.” Milbank Quarterly 94, no. 2: 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468‐0009.12189.
    1. Boland, L., F. Légaré, M. M. Perez, et al. 2017. “Impact of Home Care Versus Alternative Locations of Care on Elder Health Outcomes: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.” BMC Geriatrics 17: 20.

LinkOut - more resources