Cerebral Oximetry in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Discussion of Two Contradicting Study Results (SafeBoosC-II, SafeBoosC-III)
- PMID: 39400797
- DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-67458-7_7
Cerebral Oximetry in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Discussion of Two Contradicting Study Results (SafeBoosC-II, SafeBoosC-III)
Abstract
Recently, the usefulness of near-infrared spectroscopy-based cerebral oximetry in extremely preterm infants to prevent death or severe brain injury was evaluated in a study called SafeBoosC-III (N = 1601). In this study, the incidence of both outcomes was similar between the cerebral oximetry and the control group. In a previous smaller study called SafeBoosC-II (N = 166), there was a borderline significant advantage for cerebral oximetry. There is therefore a highly significant (p = 0.010) difference between the two outcomes. What could be the reason for the difference? One major difference was that many centres were not familiar with cerebral oximeters in the new study compared with the old study. This could be a reason for the discrepancy. We conclude that cerebral oximetry should not be disregarded as a method of neuromonitoring in neonatology.
Keywords: Brain injury; Cerebral oximetry; Death; Near infrared spectroscopy; Preterm infants.
© 2024. Oxygen Transport to Tissue International.
References
-
- Rasmussen MI et al (2023) Cerebral oximetry monitoring versus usual care for extremely preterm infants: a study protocol for the 2-year follow-up of the SafeBoosC-III randomised clinical trial. Trials 24(1)
-
- SafeBoosC-III (2023) Available from: https://www.rigshospitalet.dk/english/departments/juliane-marie-centre/d...
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
