Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct 14.
doi: 10.1111/papr.13417. Online ahead of print.

Effect of different electric stimulation modalities on pain and functionality of patients with pelvic pain: Systematic review with META-analysis

Camilla F Mendes  1 , Luciene S Oliveira  2 , Priscila A Garcez  1 , Isabela F Azevedo-Santos  3 , Josimari M DeSantana  3   4
Affiliations
Review

Effect of different electric stimulation modalities on pain and functionality of patients with pelvic pain: Systematic review with META-analysis

Camilla F Mendes et al. Pain Pract. .

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic pain is located in the anterior abdominal wall, below the umbilical scar. Its treatment includes pharmacological therapy, which can cause adverse effects and is not always sufficient to control symptoms. Thus, the use of adjunct therapies such as electric stimulation has been suggested. Therefore, this review intends to appraise the literature on the effectiveness of electrostimulation in the treatment of pelvic pain.

Methods: The search for studies was conducted until April 2024 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, SciELO, PEDro, CINAHL, BVS, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using a combination of Mesh terms "Electric Stimulation" and "Pelvic Pain." Risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis were performed with The Cochrane Collaboration tool (RevMan 5.4). Quality of the evidence was assessed with GRADE tool.

Results: From the 3247 studies found, 19 were included. In the qualitative analysis, seven studies showed TENS, electroacupuncture, PTNS, and tDCS reduced pain intensity, one study on PTNS showed increased quality of life, and one on tDCS showed improved functional performance. However, in the meta-analysis, only TENS showed efficacy for the reduction of acute pelvic pain and primary dysmenorrhea.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that there is moderate-quality evidence for TENS to reduce pain intensity in primary dysmenorrhea and low-quality evidence for the same outcome in acute pelvic pain. Randomized controlled clinical trials with larger sample size and with better methodological quality are needed to establish the effectiveness of other forms of electrical stimulation in pelvic pain.

Keywords: electric stimulation; electric stimulation therapy; pain; pelvic pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Garad R, Vancaillie TG, Farrell E. Pelvic pain: a diagnosis in itself. Aust Nurs Midwifery J. 2013;21(3):36–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0b013e318197432e
    1. Dewey K, Wittrock C. Acute pelvic pain. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2019;37(2):207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2019.01.012
    1. Le PU, Fitzgerald CM. Pelvic pain: an overview. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2017;28(3):449–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2017.03.002
    1. Passavanti MB, Pota V, Sansone P, Aurilio C, de Nardis L, Pace MC. Chronic pelvic pain: assessment, evaluation, and objectivation. Pain Res Treat. 2017;2017:9472925.
    1. IASP. IASP Terminology. 2017. https://www.iasp‐pain.org/Education/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1698

LinkOut - more resources