Vitrectomy in Small idiopathic MAcuLar hoLe (SMALL) study: Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling
- PMID: 39400983
- PMCID: PMC11986401
- DOI: 10.1111/aos.16778
Vitrectomy in Small idiopathic MAcuLar hoLe (SMALL) study: Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling
Abstract
Purpose: To compare vitrectomy with and without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in small idiopathic macular holes.
Methods: Retrospective multicentre study including consecutive eyes with ≤250 μm idiopathic macular hole treated with vitrectomy. The primary outcome was hole closure rate. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change, closure patterns on optical coherence tomography, rates of external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) recovery, and rate of complications were also investigated.
Results: In total, 693 eyes were included. Hole closure rate was 98% in the peeling and 85% in the no-peeling group (p < 0.001). At 12 months, mean BCVA change was 0.38 ± 0.22 logMAR in the peeling and 0.45 ± 0.21 logMAR in the no-peeling group (p = 0.02); 66% versus 80% of eyes had a U-shaped morphology, respectively; EZ recovery rate was 75% and 93%, respectively (p = 0.02). In the no-peeling group, eyes with a vitreomacular traction (VMT) showed a 96% closure rate, comparable to the peeling group (p = 0.40). The incidence of adverse events was similar except for dissociated optic nerve fibre layer (55% in the peeling vs. 9% in the no-peeling group, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: In small idiopathic macular holes, ILM peeling provides a higher closure rate compared to no-peeling; however, if a VMT is present closure rates are comparable. In closed macular holes, the no-peeling technique provides advantages in terms of visual outcome and anatomical recovery.
Keywords: closure rate; macular hole; no‐peeling; optical coherence tomography; peeling; small; visual acuity; vitrectomy; vitreomacular traction.
© 2024 The Author(s). Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicting relationship exists for any author.
Figures

References
-
- Azuma, K. , Hirasawa, K. , Araki, F. , Shiraya, T. , Yashiro, S. , Kato, S. et al. (2021) Fovea‐sparing as opposed to Total peeling of internal limiting membrane for myopic Foveoschisis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ophthalmol Retin, 5, 670–679. - PubMed
-
- Bringmann, A. , Unterlauft, J.D. , Barth, T. , Wiedemann, R. , Rehak, M. & Wiedemann, P. (2022) Müller cells and astrocytes in tractional macular disorders. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 86, 100977. - PubMed