Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Dec 1;184(12):1417-1424.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5463.

Acupuncture vs Sham Acupuncture for Chronic Sciatica From Herniated Disk: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Acupuncture vs Sham Acupuncture for Chronic Sciatica From Herniated Disk: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Jian-Feng Tu et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Abstract

Importance: Sciatica is commonly caused by herniated lumbar disc and contributes to severe pain and prolonged disability. Although acupuncture is widely used by patients with chronic sciatica, the evidence of its efficacy is scarce.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture in patients with chronic sciatica from herniated disk.

Design, settings, and participants: This was a multicenter 2-arm randomized clinical trial conducted in 6 tertiary-level hospitals in China of patients with chronic sciatica from herniated disk. Participants were recruited from March 25, 2021, to September 23, 2021, with a final follow-up through September 22, 2022. Data analyses were performed from December 2022 to March 2023.

Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to receive 10 sessions of acupuncture (n = 110) or sham acupuncture (n = 110) over 4 weeks. Participants, outcome assessors, and statisticians were blinded.

Main outcomes and measures: The 2 coprimary outcomes were changes in visual analog scale (VAS) for leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) from baseline to week 4. Secondary outcomes were adverse events.

Results: A total of 216 patients (mean [SD] age, 51.3 [15.2] years; 147 females [68.1%] and 69 males [31.9%]) were included in the analyses. The VAS for leg pain decreased 30.8 mm in the acupuncture group and 14.9 mm in the sham acupuncture group at week 4 (mean difference, -16.0; 95% CI, -21.3 to -10.6; P < .001). The ODI decreased 13.0 points in the acupuncture group and 4.9 points in the sham acupuncture group at week 4 (mean difference, -8.1; 95% CI, -11.1 to -5.1; P < .001). For both VAS and ODI, the between-group difference became apparent starting in week 2 (mean difference, -7.8; 95% CI, -13.0 to -2.5; P = .004 and -5.3; 95% CI, -8.4 to -2.3; P = .001, respectively) and persisted through week 52 (mean difference, -10.8; [95% CI, -16.3 to -5.2; P < .001; and -4.8; 95% CI, -7.8 to -1.7; P = .003, respectively). No serious adverse events occurred.

Conclusions and relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that in patients with chronic sciatica from herniated disk, acupuncture resulted in less pain and better function compared with sham acupuncture at week 4, and these benefits persisted through week 52. Acupuncture should be considered as a potential treatment option for patients with chronic sciatica from a herniated disk.

Trial registration: Chictr.org Identifier: ChiCTR2100044585.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. CONSORT Participant Flow Diagram
aThree patients (2 in the acupuncture group and 1 in the sham acupuncture group) were randomly assigned twice (duplicates). The fourth patient in the sham acupuncture group was determined to not meet the inclusion criteria.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Trajectory of Primary Outcomes Scores Over Time in the Acupuncture and Sham Acupuncture Groups
ODI indicates Oswestry Disability Index, and VAS, visual analog scale.

Comment in

  • Moving the Needle on Acupuncture Trials.
    Kneifati-Hayek JZ, Katz MH. Kneifati-Hayek JZ, et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2024 Dec 1;184(12):1425. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.5459. JAMA Intern Med. 2024. PMID: 39401014 No abstract available.

References

    1. Jensen RK, Kongsted A, Kjaer P, Koes B. Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica. BMJ. 2019;367:l6273. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6273 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK. Clinical practice. Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(18):1763-1772. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1512658 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Konstantinou K, Hider SL, Jordan JL, Lewis M, Dunn KM, Hay EM. The impact of low back-related leg pain on outcomes as compared with low back pain alone: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Pain. 2013;29(7):644-654. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31826f9a52 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schoenfeld AJ, Kang JD. Decision making for treatment of persistent sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(12):1161-1162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2000711 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mathieson S, Maher CG, McLachlan AJ, et al. Trial of pregabalin for acute and chronic sciatica. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(12):1111-1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614292 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data