Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 1;5(4):e240079.
doi: 10.1530/RAF-24-0079. Online ahead of print.

The landscape of assisted reproductive technology access in India

Affiliations

The landscape of assisted reproductive technology access in India

Prathima Tholeti et al. Reprod Fertil. .

Abstract

Historically, infertility has been stigmatized in the Indian society, primarily due to societal norms that equate marriage with procreation. In twentieth century, India focused primarily on over-fertility in its family planning programs, with little attention given to the complexities of infertility. The introduction of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in the late 1970s made a global revolution, including in India, offering hope to infertile couples. Despite a significant rise in ART clinics offering a wide range of treatment options in the recent years, challenges remain, particularly regarding the affordability. In India, ART is typically dominated by the private sector as government support remains limited. Efforts to standardize ART practices, including the establishment of the National ART & Surrogacy Registry and ART act aim to regulate, improve outcomes and curb unethical practice. Despite these advancements, the high cost of treatment cycles and lack of insurance coverage limit many couples' ability to undergo fertility treatment. Addressing these issues requires a multifaceted approach, including policy reform, increased public awareness, and the development of affordable treatment options to ensure broader access to reproductive care across India.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of this review.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The number of assisted reproductive technology facilities available in India (Source: https://artsurrogacy.gov.in/; last accessed 1 August 2024).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aleyamma TK Kamath MS Muthukumar K Mangalaraj AM & George K. 2011. Affordable ART: a different perspective. Human Reproduction 26 3312–3318. (10.1093/humrep/der323) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bahamondes L & Makuch MY. 2014. Infertility care and the introduction of new reproductive technologies in poor resource settings. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 12 87. (10.1186/1477-7827-12-87) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bose S Roy B & Umesh S. 2021. Marital duration, and fertility-related stress as predictors of quality of life: gender differences among primary infertile couples. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences 14 184–190. (10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_233_20) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chakraborty R. 2024. Soon, Govt hospitals to offer expensive IVF treatment valued at over Rs 2 lakh, for free to infertile couples in state. Indian Express. Available at: https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/boon-fertility-struggles....
    1. Chambers GM Hoang VP & Illingworth PJ. 2013. Socioeconomic disparities in access to ART treatment and the differential impact of a policy that increased consumer costs. Human Reproduction 28 3111–3117. (10.1093/humrep/det302) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources