Navigating 'grey areas' and challenges during evaluation of transplant eligibility in specific myelofibrosis populations: a perspective on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT
- PMID: 39402189
- DOI: 10.1038/s41409-024-02437-6
Navigating 'grey areas' and challenges during evaluation of transplant eligibility in specific myelofibrosis populations: a perspective on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT
Abstract
Significant efforts have been made to effectively select myelofibrosis (MF) patients who can benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), the only current cure for MF. The recent EBMT/ELN 2024 recommendations offer valuable guidance for hematologists and transplant physicians. However, several grey areas remain in day-to-day clinical practice regarding the feasibility and optimal preparation for transplantation in patients with this disease. Effective spleen size reduction, often achieved with JAK inhibitors, appears crucial for transplant success. For resistant cases, switching JAK inhibitors, splenectomy, or spleen irradiation may be considered, taking into account patient profiles, treatment availability and center preferences. Managing splanchnic vein thromboses, portal, and pulmonary hypertension is critical as these conditions may affect transplant outcomes. Cytopenias, particularly transfusion-dependent anemia and thrombocytopenia, complicate treatment and impact on outcomes, though new drugs show promise. Comorbidities play a significant role and tools like the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) and frailty assessments are useful for evaluating transplant risks while allowing the implementation of corrective measures. Especially in low- and medium-income countries where access to novel therapies may be challenging, allo-HCT still represents an attractive therapeutic option for MF. Future directions include integrating new therapeutics into the transplant algorithm and leveraging artificial intelligence for more informed risk assessment, highlighting the need for tailored approaches to improve allo-HCT outcomes in such a setting.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian RP, Borowitz MJ, Calvo KR, Kvasnicka HM, et al. International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Blood. 2022;140:1200–28. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2022015850 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, Akkari Y, Alaggio R, Apperley JF, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022;36:1703–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01613-1 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Polverelli N, Breccia M, Benevolo G, Martino B, Tieghi A, Latagliata R, et al. Risk factors for infections in myelofibrosis: role of disease status and treatment. a multicenter study of 507 patients. Am J Hematol. 2017;92:37–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.24572 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2023;98:801–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26857 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kröger NM, Deeg JH, Olavarria E, Niederwieser D, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary myelofibrosis: a consensus process by an EBMT/ELN international working group. Leukemia. 2015;29:2126–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.233 . - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
