Physician preferences for Online and In-person continuing medical education: a cross-sectional study
- PMID: 39402550
- PMCID: PMC11476101
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06046-1
Physician preferences for Online and In-person continuing medical education: a cross-sectional study
Abstract
Background: The worldwide market for continuing medical education (CME) was severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, which precipitated an increase in web-based CME course attendance. Virtual education methods may be effective for engaging learners and changing behaviors. However, more information is needed about physician preferences for in-person vs. livestreamed CME courses in the postpandemic era. Because of the paucity of data regarding this topic, the current study was designed to evaluate CME participant characteristics, preferences, engagement, and satisfaction with traditional in-person vs. virtual educational methods.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed of attendees of two large internal medicine CME courses held in 2021. Both CME courses were offered via in-person and livestream options, and were taught by Mayo Clinic content experts. Participants, who consisted of practicing physicians seeking CME, completed a 41-question survey after CME course completion. Statistical comparisons were performed by using Fisher exact tests for all survey items, except for those with ordinal response sets, which were compared with Cochran-Armitage trend tests.
Results: A total of 146 participants completed the survey (response rate, 30.2%). Among the 77 respondents who attended in-person courses, the most frequent reasons indicated were the opportunity to travel (66%) and collaboration/networking with others (25%). Among the 68 respondents who attended the livestream courses, the most frequent reasons indicated included COVID-19-related concerns (65%), convenience (46%), and travel costs (34%). The percentage of respondents who indicated that they would choose the same mode of attendance if given the option again was higher for those who attended in person than for those who attended via livestream (91% vs. 65%, P < .001).
Conclusions: These data suggest that in-person course offerings will continue to be a preferred learning method for some physicians. However, most respondents who attended virtually preferred that method. Therefore, hybrid CME models offering both in-person and virtual options may be most beneficial for meeting the needs of all CME learners.
Keywords: Continuing medical education; Hybrid learning; In-person learning; Livestream learning.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
M.R.M. has received funding from The France Foundation; R.G. has received funding from The France Foundation and is on the scientific advisory board for Alpaca Health; S.L.B. is on the scientific advisory board for CorMedix; A.B.M. has a grant from Purina.
Similar articles
-
Learner engagement and teaching effectiveness in livestreamed versus in-person CME.Med Educ. 2023 Apr;57(4):349-358. doi: 10.1111/medu.14996. Epub 2022 Dec 12. Med Educ. 2023. PMID: 36454138
-
Physicians' attitude towards webinars and online education amid COVID-19 pandemic: When less is more.PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250241. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33861799 Free PMC article.
-
A post-COVID syndrome curriculum for continuing medical education (CME): in-person versus livestream.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 27;11:1438068. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1438068. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39257891 Free PMC article.
-
Reinvigorating Continuing Medical Education: Meeting the Challenges of the Digital Age.Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Dec;94(12):2501-2509. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.07.004. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019. PMID: 31806103 Review.
-
Collaborative online learning: a new approach to distance CME.Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):928-9. Acad Med. 2002. PMID: 12228097 Review.
Cited by
-
China's national continuing medical education program for general practitioners: a cross-sectional survey (2016-2023).BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06682-1. BMC Med Educ. 2025. PMID: 39825298 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cervero RM, Gaines JK. The impact of CME on physician performance and patient health outcomes: an updated synthesis of systematic reviews. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015;35(2):131–8. - PubMed
-
- Mazmanian PE, Davis DA. Continuing medical education and the physician as a learner: guide to the evidence. JAMA. 2002;288(9):1057–60. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical