Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;27(1):196-206.
doi: 10.1111/dom.16001. Epub 2024 Oct 14.

In vivo mapping of postprandial hepatic glucose metabolism using dynamic magnetic resonance spectroscopy combined with stable isotope flux analysis in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass adults and non-operated controls: A case-control study

Affiliations

In vivo mapping of postprandial hepatic glucose metabolism using dynamic magnetic resonance spectroscopy combined with stable isotope flux analysis in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass adults and non-operated controls: A case-control study

Simone Poli et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Aims: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery alters postprandial glucose profiles, causing post-bariatric hypoglycaemia (PBH) in some individuals. Due to the liver's central role in glucose homeostasis, hepatic glucose handling might differ in RYGB-operated patients with PBH compared to non-operated healthy controls (HC).

Materials and methods: We enrolled RYGB-operated adults with PBH and HCs (n = 10 each). Participants ingested 60 g of [6,6'-2H2]-glucose (d-glucose) after an overnight fast. Deuterium metabolic imaging (DMI) with interleaved 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy was performed before and until 150 min post-d-glucose intake, with frequent blood sampling to quantify glucose enrichment and gluco-regulatory hormones until 180 min. Glucose fluxes were assessed by mathematical modelling. Outcome trajectories were described using generalized additive models.

Results: In RYGB subjects, the hepatic d-glucose signal increased early, followed by a decrease, whereas HCs exhibited a gradual increase and consecutive stabilization. Postprandial hepatic glycogen accumulation and the suppression of endogenous glucose production were lower in RYGB patients than in HCs, despite higher insulin exposure, indicating lower hepatic insulin sensitivity. The systemic rate of ingested d-glucose was faster in RYGB, leading to a higher, earlier plasma glucose peak and increased insulin secretion. Postprandial glucose disposal increased in RYGB patients, without between-group differences in peripheral insulin sensitivity.

Conclusions: Exploiting DMI with stable isotope flux analysis, we observed distinct postprandial hepatic glucose trajectories and parameters of glucose-insulin homeostasis in RYGB patients with PBH versus HCs. Despite altered postprandial glucose kinetics and higher insulin exposure, there was no evidence of impaired hepatic glucose uptake or output predisposing to PBH in RYGB patients.

Keywords: Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass; glucose production; glycogen synthesis; liver metabolism; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; metabolic imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Total plasma glucose, hepatic d‐glucose and glycogen trajectories during the postprandial period. Hepatic d‐glucose was obtained from DMI (deuterium metabolic imaging), and hepatic glycogen was obtained using 13C‐MRS (magnetic resonance spectroscopy). Dashed lines represent trajectories for each subject. GAM (generalized additive model) results are shown with solid lines, and the 95% CI (confidence interval) is indicated by shaded areas. d‐Glucose, [6,6′‐2H2]‐glucose; HC, healthy control; RYGB, Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Plasma levels of gluco‐regulatory hormones during the postprandial period. Dashed lines represent trajectories for each subject. GAM (generalized additive model) results are indicated by solid lines, and 95% CI (confidence interval) is indicated by shaded areas. HC, healthy controls; RYGB, Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Plasma d‐glucose and plasma endogenous glucose trajectories during the postprandial period. Dashed lines represent trajectories for each subject. GAM (generalized additive model) results are indicated by solid lines, and 95% CI (confidence interval) is represented by the shaded areas. d‐Glucose, [6,6′‐2H2]‐glucose; HC, healthy control; RYGB, Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass.

Similar articles

References

    1. Mingrone G, Panunzi S, De Gaetano A, et al. Metabolic surgery versus conventional medical therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: 10‐year follow‐up of an open‐label, single‐centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10271):293‐304. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32649-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Svane MS, Bojsen‐Møller KN, Martinussen C, et al. Postprandial nutrient handling and gastrointestinal hormone secretion after roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(6):1627‐1641. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.262 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sandoval DA, Patti ME. Glucose metabolism after bariatric surgery: implications for T2DM remission and hypoglycaemia. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023;19(3):164‐176. doi:10.1038/s41574-022-00757-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Honka H, Salehi M. Postprandial hypoglycemia after gastric bypass surgery: from pathogenesis to diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2019;22(4):295‐302. doi:10.1097/MCO.0000000000000574 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes–3‐year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(21):2002‐2013. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1401329 - DOI - PMC - PubMed