Forensic STR and SNP Genotyping of Formalin-Fixed Skeleton Samples With Illumina's ForenSeq System
- PMID: 39402849
- DOI: 10.1002/elps.202400056
Forensic STR and SNP Genotyping of Formalin-Fixed Skeleton Samples With Illumina's ForenSeq System
Abstract
Formalin fixatives are widely used in forensics to preserve tissues. However, extracting high-quality genomic DNA from formalin-fixed samples is challenging. Traditional short tandem repeat (STR) analysis using capillary electrophoresis (CE) for forensic DNA typing frequently results in failure. Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) can handle many samples and thousands of genetic markers, usually single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and STRs, in a single test. Thus, it is useful for assessing highly deteriorated forensic evidence. Few studies have examined the effectiveness of STRs and SNPs genotyping of formalin-fixed skeletons using MPS. In this study, 55 skeletal samples from 5 individuals that were treated under different formalin fixation times (5-75 days) were examined and sequenced using the ForenSeq DNA Signature Prep Kit on the Illumina MiSeq FGX platform. The results showed that as the duration of formalin fixation increased, the detection rates of STRs and SNPs gradually decreased. After 75 days of fixation, the average detection rates for STRs and SNPs were 4% and 10%, respectively. The cumulative discrimination power (CDP) of individual identification SNPs (iiSNPs) was >0.9999 on the 45th day. However, the CDP of STRs was 0.9930 on the 22nd day. Low detection rates were observed for six STRs (D1S1656, PentaE, D22S1045, PentaD, DX8378 and DX10103) and five SNPs (rs2920816, rs354439, rs1736442, rs338882 and rs1031825). In conclusion, DNA extracted from formalin-fixed skeletons decomposes rapidly over time, and MPS technology can be a useful tool for detecting forensic genetic markers in such samples.
Keywords: formalin fixative; massively parallel sequencing; short tandem repeat (STR); single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP); skeleton.
© 2024 Wiley‐VCH GmbH.
References
-
- R. L. Romero, A. C. Juston, J. Ballantyne, and B. E. Henry, “The Applicability of Formalin‐Fixed and Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissues in Forensic DNA Analysis,” Journal of Forensic Science 42 (1997): 708–714.
-
- W. Jian, K. Liu, J. Yu, et al., “Influence of Different Staining Techniques and Fixing Methods on the DNA Analysis of Histological Sections,” Forensic Science Technology 02 (2003): 24–26.
-
- X. Ruiguang, W. Lin, Z. Qirong, et al., “Effect of Fixation Time on Detecting STR Loci From Human Tissues Fixed by Neutral Buffered Formalin,” Forensic Science Technology 45 (2020): 30–34.
-
- Y. Liu, L. Li, Z. Zhao, Y. Lin, and T. Que, “The Detectable Time Limit of Intact STR Profile for Human Tissues in Unbuffered Formalin,” Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine 25 (2010): 1–5.
-
- P. Deng, L. Sun, M. Bai, et al., “Comparison of Detection of SNP and STR in Formalin‐Fixed Tissue,” Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine 403 (2017): 397–399.
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
