Left ventricular unloading to facilitate ventricular remodelling in heart failure: A narrative review of mechanical circulatory support
- PMID: 39402908
- PMCID: PMC11522852
- DOI: 10.1113/EP091796
Left ventricular unloading to facilitate ventricular remodelling in heart failure: A narrative review of mechanical circulatory support
Abstract
Heart failure represents a dynamic clinical challenge with the continuous rise of a multi-morbid and ageing population. Yet, the evolving nature of mechanical circulatory support offers a variety of means to manage candidates who might benefit from such interventions. This narrative review focuses on the role of the main mechanical circulatory support devices, such as ventricular assist device, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, Impella and TandemHeart, in the physiological process of ventricular unloading and remodelling in heart failure, highlighting their characteristics, mechanism and clinical outcomes. The outcome measures described include physiological changes (i.e., stroke volume or preload and afterload), intracardiac pressure (i.e., end-diastolic pressure) and extracardiac pressure (i.e., pulmonary capillary wedge pressure). Overall, all the above mechanical circulatory support strategies can facilitate the unloading of the ventricular failure through different mechanisms, which subsequently affects the ventricular remodelling process. These physiological changes start immediately after ventricular assist device implantation. The devices are indicated in different but overlapping populations and operate in distinctive ways; yet, they have evidenced performance to a favourable standard to improve cardiac function in heart failure, although this proved variable for different devices, and further high-quality trials are vital to assess their clinical outcomes further. Both Impella and TandemHeart are indicated mainly in cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention patients; at the time the literature was evaluated, both devices were found to yield a significant improvement in haemodynamics but not in survival. Nevertheless, the choice of device strategy should be based on individual patient factors, including indication, to optimize clinical outcomes.
Keywords: heart failure; left ventricular unloading; mechanical circulatory support; ventricular remodelling.
© 2024 The Author(s). Experimental Physiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Physiological Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
-
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus counterpulsatile, pulsatile, and continuous left ventricular unloading for pediatric mechanical circulatory support.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov;14(9):e424-37. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182a551b0. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 24108116 Free PMC article.
-
Hemodynamic support with percutaneous devices in patients with heart failure.Heart Fail Clin. 2015 Apr;11(2):215-30. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2014.12.012. Epub 2015 Feb 21. Heart Fail Clin. 2015. PMID: 25834971 Review.
-
Percutaneous bi-atrial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute circulatory support in advanced heart failure.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 May;85(6):1097-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25791. Epub 2015 Jan 13. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. PMID: 25529821
-
Hemodynamic Effects of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Ventricular Septal Defect.Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Jul;12(7):e005981. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.005981. Epub 2019 Jul 12. Circ Heart Fail. 2019. PMID: 31296094
-
Science of left ventricular unloading.Perfusion. 2025 May;40(4):818-831. doi: 10.1177/02676591241268389. Epub 2024 Jul 26. Perfusion. 2025. PMID: 39058419 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Anderson, M. B. , Goldstein, J. , Milano, C. , Morris, L. D. , Kormos, R. L. , Bhama, J. , Kapur, N. K. , Bansal, A. , Garcia, J. , Baker, J. N. , Silvestry, S. , Holman, W. L. , Douglas, P. S. , & O'Neill, W. (2015). Benefits of a novel percutaneous ventricular assist device for right heart failure: The prospective RECOVER RIGHT study of the Impella RP device. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation : The Official Publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation, 34(12), 1549–1560. - PubMed
-
- Barbone, A. , Holmes, J. W. , Heerdt, P. M. , The’, A. H. , Naka, Y. , Joshi, N. , Daines, M. , Marks, A. R. , Oz, M. C. , & Burkhoff, D. (2001). Comparison of right and left ventricular responses to left ventricular assist device support in patients with severe heart failure: A primary role of mechanical unloading underlying reverse remodeling. Circulation, 104(6), 670–675. - PubMed
-
- Bartling, B. , Milting, H. , Schumann, H. , Darmer, D. , Arusoglu, L. , Koerner, M. M. , El‐Banayosy, A. , Koerfer, R. , Holtz, J. , & Zerkowski, H. R. (1999). Myocardial gene expression of regulators of myocyte apoptosis and myocyte calcium homeostasis during hemodynamic unloading by ventricular assist devices in patients with end‐stage heart failure. Circulation, 100, (19 Suppl), II216–23. - PubMed
-
- Bruckner, B. A. , Jacob, L. P. , Gregoric, I. D. , Loyalka, P. , Kar, B. , Cohn, W. E. , La Francesca, S. , Radovancevic, B. , & Frazier, O. H. (2008). Clinical experience with the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. Texas Heart Institute Journal, 35(4), 447–450. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical