Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct 13:10:20552076241277438.
doi: 10.1177/20552076241277438. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

Value-based digital health: A systematic literature review of the value elements of digital health care

Marisa Merino  1 , Jaime Del Barrio  2 , Roberto Nuño  3 , María Errea  4
Affiliations
Review

Value-based digital health: A systematic literature review of the value elements of digital health care

Marisa Merino et al. Digit Health. .

Abstract

Objective: To carry out a systematic literature review to identify the Value Based Digital Health elements.

Methods: The search for records was carried out for the period 2012 to January 2024, in two main databases, EMBASE and Scopus. Records were limited to studies published since 2012. Studies presented either a conceptual framework on the concept of Value-Based Digital Health (VBDH), or results from an empirical work to generate evidence on the value of digital health, or a combination of both. The characteristics of the study, the type of digital health and measures and/or their value elements included, are synthesized and interpreted. To synthetize information, the patient journey phases are used as themes, where the identified value elements are allocated. This is analyzed by type of agent (of the general healthcare framework).

Results: The search yielded a total of 606 abstracts for screening. In the end, 67 studies were finally included for data extraction. VBDH elements are presented by phases of the patient journey and by agent. Despite the high heterogeneity of patients, theoretical and empirical works converge in elements such as the value of patient-centered care, education (health literacy) in the use of new digital health technologies, mechanisms to increase patient confidence and their participation in the health decision-making processes, or the importance of collecting patients' reported outcomes and experiences, among other elements. The review also found empty areas among theoretical and empirical studies, where no VBDH elements were identified.

Conclusion: This systematic review identified the theoretical and empirical elements to measure the value of digital health and provides a framework of VBDH elements. Some of the theoretical elements are actually used in practice. Others, however, despite being relevant from a theoretical point of view, do not seem to be measured empirically. This work provides researchers of a source, for consultation, of value based digital health elements. This is helpful for improving the measurement of the value of digital health.

Keywords: Systematic literature review; digital health; eHealth; strategic framework; value based health care; value-based digital health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram result of the systematic literature review.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Framework of value elements by agent type and application area of the patient journey according to theoretical literature.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Framework of value elements by agent type and application area of the patient journey according to empirical literature.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Value elements by agent type and application area of the patient journey according to mixed methods literature.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ibrahim MS, Mohamed Yusoff H, Abu Bakar YI, et al. Digital health for quality healthcare: a systematic mapping of review studies. Digital Health 2022; 8: 205520762210858. Available at: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/20552076221085810. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nuño-Solinís R, Urizar E, Merino M, et al. Validation study of a value-based digital health questionnaire. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 7034. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/12/7034. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2477–2481. Available at: https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMp1011024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meskó B, Drobni Z, Bényei É, et al. Digital health is a cultural transformation of traditional healthcare. Mhealth 2017; 3: 38. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5682364/. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sonnier P. The fourth wave: Digital health—a new era of human progress. Independently Published 2017. Available at: https://storyofdigitalhealth.com/book

LinkOut - more resources