Sacrocolpopexy: The Way I Do It
- PMID: 39404818
- PMCID: PMC11638296
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05922-0
Sacrocolpopexy: The Way I Do It
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is an established surgical procedure for apical vaginal vault prolapse. There remains significant variation amongst surgeons in both the surgical steps and concomitant surgeries utilised when undertaking an SCP.
Methods: This review article is aimed at summarising the evidence and providing a detailed update of SCP in modern practice, reviewing contemporary evidence behind its indications, efficacy, outcomes, surgical steps, and complications.
Results: Sacrocolpopexy remains the gold standard for post-hysterectomy apical prolapse based on good long-term outcomes, patient satisfaction and low complication rates. SCP with concomitant total hysterectomy is not recommended owing to high rates of mesh exposure. The laparoscopic approach remains the preferred option in terms of low morbidity, quicker recovery and lower cost than alternative access options. For optimal outcomes an SCP should be performed with monofilament mesh, using absorbable sutures and with a paravaginal repair for cystocele.
Conclusions: Although SCP has become increasingly utilised for apical prolapse, its established efficacy regarding anatomical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and complications is in the context of post-hysterectomy prolapse. SCP with concomitant total hysterectomy has higher rates of mesh exposure. The efficacy and safety of SCP with sub-total hysterectomy or hysteropexy have not been clearly established and require further assessment through well-designed, rigorous randomised controlled trials.
Keywords: Apical; Exposure; Mesh; Prolapse; Sacrocolpopexy; Vault.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of Interest: None. Ethics approval: This is a review article and no ethics approval was required or obtained.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Sep;30(9):1475-1481. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03952-7. Epub 2019 Apr 30. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. PMID: 31041499
-
Clinical outcomes and complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with versus without concomitant hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse in Hong Kong Chinese patients after median follow-up of 7 years.Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jan;34(1):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05403-2. Epub 2022 Nov 17. Int Urogynecol J. 2023. PMID: 36394632
-
RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov;29(11):1607-1614. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3687-2. Epub 2018 Jun 30. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 29961110 Clinical Trial.
-
Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):129-146.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Jan 17. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29353031
-
[Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: guidelines for clinical practice].Prog Urol. 2016 Jul;26 Suppl 1:S27-37. doi: 10.1016/S1166-7087(16)30426-2. Prog Urol. 2016. PMID: 27595624 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Comment on "The Relationship Between the Distance of Common Iliac Artery Bifurcation to the Sacral Promontory and Sacropelvic Parameters: Implications for Sacropexy Operations".Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06225-8. Online ahead of print. Int Urogynecol J. 2025. PMID: 40888926 No abstract available.
-
A Novel Graphene-Based Nanomaterial for the Development of a Pelvic Implant to Treat Pelvic Organ Prolapse.J Funct Biomater. 2024 Nov 20;15(11):351. doi: 10.3390/jfb15110351. J Funct Biomater. 2024. PMID: 39590554 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lane FE. Repair of posthysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1962;20(1):72–7. - PubMed
-
- Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, de Tayrac R, Dietz V, Guldberg R, et al. Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the organization for economic cooperation and development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):755.e1–27. - PubMed
-
- Toozs-Hobson P, Boos K, Cardozo L. Management of vaginal vault prolapse. Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:13–7. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09343.x. - PubMed
-
- Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(6):1418–21. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical