Sacrocolpopexy: The Way I Do It
- PMID: 39404818
- PMCID: PMC11638296
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-024-05922-0
Sacrocolpopexy: The Way I Do It
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is an established surgical procedure for apical vaginal vault prolapse. There remains significant variation amongst surgeons in both the surgical steps and concomitant surgeries utilised when undertaking an SCP.
Methods: This review article is aimed at summarising the evidence and providing a detailed update of SCP in modern practice, reviewing contemporary evidence behind its indications, efficacy, outcomes, surgical steps, and complications.
Results: Sacrocolpopexy remains the gold standard for post-hysterectomy apical prolapse based on good long-term outcomes, patient satisfaction and low complication rates. SCP with concomitant total hysterectomy is not recommended owing to high rates of mesh exposure. The laparoscopic approach remains the preferred option in terms of low morbidity, quicker recovery and lower cost than alternative access options. For optimal outcomes an SCP should be performed with monofilament mesh, using absorbable sutures and with a paravaginal repair for cystocele.
Conclusions: Although SCP has become increasingly utilised for apical prolapse, its established efficacy regarding anatomical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and complications is in the context of post-hysterectomy prolapse. SCP with concomitant total hysterectomy has higher rates of mesh exposure. The efficacy and safety of SCP with sub-total hysterectomy or hysteropexy have not been clearly established and require further assessment through well-designed, rigorous randomised controlled trials.
Keywords: Apical; Exposure; Mesh; Prolapse; Sacrocolpopexy; Vault.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of Interest: None. Ethics approval: This is a review article and no ethics approval was required or obtained.
Figures
References
-
- Lane FE. Repair of posthysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1962;20(1):72–7. - PubMed
-
- Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, de Tayrac R, Dietz V, Guldberg R, et al. Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the organization for economic cooperation and development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):755.e1–27. - PubMed
-
- Toozs-Hobson P, Boos K, Cardozo L. Management of vaginal vault prolapse. Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:13–7. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09343.x. - PubMed
-
- Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(6):1418–21. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
