Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Feb 1;26(2):98-111.
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnae103.

Noninvasive brain stimulation beyond the motor cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring effects on quantitative sensory testing in clinical pain

Andrew Flood  1   2 , Rocco Cavaleri  3   4 , We-Ju Chang  5   6 , Jason Kutch  7 , Constantino Toufexis  1   2 , Simon J Summers  3   4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Noninvasive brain stimulation beyond the motor cortex: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring effects on quantitative sensory testing in clinical pain

Andrew Flood et al. Pain Med. .

Abstract

Background: Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has been investigated increasingly as a means of treating pain. The effectiveness of NIBS in the treatment of pain has traditionally focused on protocols targeting the primary motor cortex (M1). However, over time, the effectiveness of M1 NIBS has been attributed to effects on interconnected cortical and subcortical sites rather than on M1 itself. Although previous reviews have demonstrated the effectiveness of non-M1 NIBS in improving subjective reports of pain intensity, the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying these effects remain incompletely understood. As chronic pain is associated with pain hypersensitivity and impaired endogenous descending pain modulation, it is plausible that non-M1 NIBS promotes analgesic effects by influencing these processes.

Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore to evaluate the effect of NIBS over non-M1 sites on quantitative sensory testing measures in clinical pain populations.

Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases was conducted from inception to January 2024. Included articles (13 trials, n = 565 participants) were appraised with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), and a random-effects model was used to meta-analyze outcomes where possible.

Results: A small number of studies found that NIBS applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex might improve pain modulation in patients with fibromyalgia and that stimulation of the posterior superior insula and prefrontal cortex could improve pain sensitivity in chronic neuropathic and osteoarthritic pain, respectively. However, findings varied among studies, and there remains a paucity of primary research.

Conclusion: This review indicates that current literature does not provide clear evidence that NIBS over non-M1 sites influences pain processing.

Study registration: PROSPERO (CRD42020201076).

Keywords: endogenous pain modulation; noninvasive brain stimulation; pain sensitivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA flow diagram. PRISMA= Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effect of DLPFC NIBS on heat pain threshold. DLPFC= dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; NIBS= noninvasive brain stimulation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effect of DLPFC NIBS on pressure pain threshold. DLPFC= dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; NIBS= noninvasive brain stimulation.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effect of DLPFC NIBS on heat pain tolerance. DLPFC= dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; NIBS= noninvasive brain stimulation.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Effect of DLPFC NIBS on conditioned pain modulation. DLPFC= dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; NIBS= noninvasive brain stimulation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Staud R. Abnormal endogenous pain modulation is a shared characteristic of many chronic pain conditions. Expert Rev Neurother. 2012;12(5):577-585. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gwilym S, Oag H, Tracey I, Carr A. Evidence that central sensitisation is present in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome and influences the outcome after surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(4):498-502. - PubMed
    1. Dürsteler C, Salazar Y, Rodriguez U, Pelfort X, Verdié LP. Conditioned pain modulation predicts persistent pain after knee replacement surgery. PR9. 2021;6(1):e910. - PMC - PubMed
    1. den Boer C, Dries L, Terluin B, et al. Central sensitization in chronic pain and medically unexplained symptom research: a systematic review of definitions, operationalizations and measurement instruments. J Psychosom Res. 2019;117:32-40. - PubMed
    1. Yarnitsky D. Role of endogenous pain modulation in chronic pain mechanisms and treatment. PAIN. 2015;156(suppl 1):S24-S31. - PubMed

MeSH terms