Effects of selected dietary supplements on migraine prophylaxis: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 39404918
- DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07794-0
Effects of selected dietary supplements on migraine prophylaxis: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background: The existing evidence on the effect of dietary supplements for preventing migraines has generated conflicting results.
Methods: We assessed alterations in migraine clinical features corresponding to the intake of dietary supplements. Our main outcomes included the frequency (number of attacks), duration (in hours), the severity (intensity) and the monthly migraine days. Using a dose-response meta-analysis, we estimated the dose-dependent impact. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE tool.
Results: Finally, twenty-two trials were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Magnesium supplementation reduced migraine attacks (mean difference (MD) = -2.51), severity (MD = -0.88), and the monthly migraine days (MD = -1.66) compared with the control group. CoQ10 decreased the frequency (MD = -1.73), severity (MD = -1.35), and duration of migraine (MD = -1.72). Riboflavin decreased attack frequency (MD = -1.34). Alpha-lipoic acid decreased attack frequency (MD = -1.24) and severity (MD = -0.38). Probiotics decreased the frequency (MD = -1.16), severity (MD = -1.07) and the monthly migraine days (MD = -3.02). Vitamin D reduced migraine frequency (MD = -1.69) and the monthly migraine days (MD = -2.41). In adults, compared with placebo, these supplements did not significantly affect other outcomes, and omega-3 supplementation did not yield a statistically significant reduction in any of these outcomes.
Conclusion: The use of certain dietary supplements has resulted in a significant decrease in migraine prophylaxis. Further clinical trials of high quality appear to be beneficial.
Keywords: Clinical features; Dietary supplements; Dose–response meta-analysis; Migraine.
© 2024. Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical approval: 1) This material is the authors’ own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere. 2) The paper is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 3) The paper reflects the authors’ own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner. 4) The authors have no conflict of interest. Conflict of interest: The authors declared no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Stovner L, Hagen K, Jensen R et al (2018) The global burden of headache. Seminars in neurology. Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, pp 182–190
-
- Silberstein SD (2015) Preventive migraine treatment. Continuum Lifelong Learn Neurol 21:973 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical