Comparative analysis of BAG1 and BAG2: Insights into their structures, functions and implications in disease pathogenesis
- PMID: 39405938
- DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.113369
Comparative analysis of BAG1 and BAG2: Insights into their structures, functions and implications in disease pathogenesis
Abstract
As BAG family members, Bcl-2 associated athanogene family protein 1 (BAG1) and 2 (BAG2) are implicated in multiple cellular processes, including apoptosis, autophagy, protein folding and homeostasis. Although structurally similar, they considerably differ in many ways. Unlike BAG2, BAG1 has four isoforms (BAG1L, BAG1M, BAG1S and BAG1 p29) displaying different expression features and functional patterns. BAG1 and BAG2 play different cellular functions by interacting with different molecules to participate in the regulation of various diseases, including cancer/tumor and neurodegenerative diseases. Commonly, BAG1 acts as a protective factor to predict a good prognosis of patients with some types of cancer or a risk factor in some other cancers, while BAG2 is regarded as a risk factor to promote cancer/tumor progression. In neurodegenerative diseases, BAG2 commonly acts as a neuroprotective factor. In this review, we summarized the differences in molacular structure and biological function between BAG1 and BAG2, as well as the influences of them on pathogenesis of diseases, and explore the prospects for their clinical therapy application by specifying the activators and inhibitors of BAG1 and BAG2, which might provide a better understanding of the underlying pathogenesis and developing the targeted therapy strategies for diseases.
Keywords: BAG1; BAG2; Molecular chaperone; Neurodegenerative disease; Prognosis.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Interaction between the BAG1S isoform and HSP70 mediates the stability of anti-apoptotic proteins and the survival of osteosarcoma cells expressing oncogenic MYC.BMC Cancer. 2019 Mar 22;19(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5454-2. BMC Cancer. 2019. PMID: 30902071 Free PMC article.
-
Deciphering the prognostic and therapeutic significance of BAG1 and BAG2 for predicting distinct survival outcome and effects on liposarcoma.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 4;14(1):23084. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67659-6. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39366981 Free PMC article.
-
BAG2 structure, function and involvement in disease.Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2016 Sep 20;21:18. doi: 10.1186/s11658-016-0020-2. eCollection 2016. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2016. PMID: 28536620 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Structure-function analysis of Bag1 proteins. Effects on androgen receptor transcriptional activity.J Biol Chem. 2001 Apr 20;276(16):12718-24. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010841200. Epub 2001 Jan 19. J Biol Chem. 2001. PMID: 11278763
-
Breaking BAG: The Co-Chaperone BAG3 in Health and Disease.Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2016 Aug;37(8):672-688. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 6. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2016. PMID: 27162137 Review.
Cited by
-
Targeting the BAG2/CHIP axis promotes gastric cancer apoptosis by blocking apoptosome assembly.Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 18;16:1578416. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1578416. eCollection 2025. Front Immunol. 2025. PMID: 40755756 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials