Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 28;13(19):5783.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13195783.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Endometriosis: The Role of Advanced Techniques

Affiliations
Review

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Endometriosis: The Role of Advanced Techniques

Laura Alonzo et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects about 10% of women, and it is characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. Associated symptoms are dyspareunia, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility. The diagnosis of endometriosis can be challenging due to various clinical and imaging presentations. Laparoscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis, but it is an invasive procedure. The literature has increasingly promoted a switch to less invasive imaging techniques, such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The latter, also in relation to the latest technological advances, allows a comprehensive and accurate assessment of the pelvis and it can also identify sites of endometriosis that escape laparoscopic evaluation. Furthermore, MRI has been found to be more accurate than other imaging techniques in relation to its improved sensitivity and specificity in identifying disease sites, also due to the role of new emerging sequences. This article aims to review the current role of advanced MRI applications in the assessment of endometriosis.

Keywords: diffusion weighted imaging; endometriosis; female pelvis; magnetic resonance imaging; tractography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Roberto Cannella received support for attending meetings from Bracco and Bayer and has research collaboration with Siemens Healthineers. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Right and left ovarian cysts showing high signal content on an axial fat-saturated T1-weighted image (a, arrow) and low signal on an axial T2-weighted image (b), suggesting hemorrhagic content. Both ovaries appear enlarged and in close relation, located in the rectouterine space (“kissing ovaries”).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hypointense nodules in the pouch of Douglas on an axial T2-weighted image (a) with some small high-signal foci on a coronal T1-weighted image (b, arrow), more evident on an axial fat-saturated T1-weighted image (c, arrow), compatible with deep pelvic endometriosis with evidence of bleeding.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Axial pre-contrast (a) and axial post-contrast (b) images demonstrate a left pyosalpinx with an enlarged and multicystic ovary attributable to an ovarian tube abscess, both demonstrating wall enhancement.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Diffusion-weighted imaging at b = 800 (a) shows a hyperintense lesion (arrow) with hypointensity on ADC map (b) indicating restricted diffusion, consistent with endometrioma.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of 3D MR neurography showing lumbosacral plexus nerve roots. Images are displayed in the coronal plane. In a healthy woman (a), the fiber bundles display a homogeneous appearance and regular course bilaterally. In a woman affected by endometriosis (b), the fiber bundles display a discontinuous and partially interrupted course on the right side (arrow).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Fiber tracking reconstruction in two women affected by endometriosis of the posterior compartment (a,b). The fiber bundles in both cases are short, stubby, and have lots of branches.

References

    1. La Rosa V.L., De Franciscis P., Barra F., Schiattarella A., Török P., Shah M., Karaman E., Cerentini T.M., Di Guardo F., Gullo G., et al. Quality of life in women with endometriosis: A narrative overview. Minerva Med. 2020;111:68–78. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.19.06298-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Habib N., Buzzaccarini G., Centini G., Moawad G., Ceccaldi P.-F., Gitas G., Alkatout I., Gullo G., Terzic S., Sleiman Z. Impact of lifestyle and diet on endometriosis: A fresh look to a busy corner. Prz. Menopauzalny. 2022;21:124–132. doi: 10.5114/pm.2022.116437. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Scarselli G., Rizzello F., Cammilli F., Ginocchini L., Coccia M.E. Diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. A review. Minerva Ginecol. 2005;57:55–78. - PubMed
    1. Zuber M., Shoaib M., Kumari S. Magnetic resonance imaging of endometriosis: A common but often hidden, missed, and misdiagnosed entity. Pol. J. Radiol. 2022;87:448–461. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2022.119032. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abdelghany H.S., Abdelsamie M.A., Shaheen K.I., Yousri D.A. The clinical importance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Diffusion weighted images in diagnosis and treatment planning of endometriosis. Minia J. Med. Res. 2021;32:13–20. doi: 10.21608/mjmr.2022.220571. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources