Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 2;13(19):5875.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13195875.

Leukocyte Indices as Markers of Inflammation and Predictors of Outcome in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Affiliations

Leukocyte Indices as Markers of Inflammation and Predictors of Outcome in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Michael Poledniczek et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: The pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is suggested to be influenced by inflammation. Leukocyte indices, including the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), the monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and the pan-immune inflammation value (PIV), can be utilized as biomarkers of systemic inflammation. Their prognostic utility is yet to be fully understood. Methods: Between December 2010 and May 2023, patients presenting to a tertiary referral center for HFpEF were included into a prospective registry. The association of the NLR, MLR, and PIV with the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and HF-related hospitalization was tested utilizing Cox regression analysis. Results: In total, 479 patients (median 74.3, interquartile range (IQR): 69.22-78.3 years, 27.8% male) were included. Patients were observed for 43 (IQR: 11-70) months, during which a total of 267 (55.7%) patients met the primary endpoint. In a univariate Cox regression analysis, an above-the-median NLR implied a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.76 (95%-confidence interval (CI): 1.38-2.24, p < 0.001), an MLR of 1.46 (95%-CI: 1.14-1.86, p = 0.003), and a PIV of 1.67, 95%-CI: 1.30-2.13, p < 0.001) for the composite endpoint. After adjustment in a step-wise model, the NLR (HR: 1.81, 95%-CI: 1.22-2.69, p = 0.003), the MLR (HR: 1.57, 95%-CI: 1.06-2.34, p = 0.026), and the PIV (HR: 1.64, 95%-CI: 1.10-2.46, p = 0.015) remained significantly associated with the combined endpoint. Conclusions: The NLR, the MLR, and the PIV are simple biomarkers independently associated with outcomes in patients with HFpEF.

Keywords: heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; leukocyte indices; systemic inflammation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.H. has received payments for proctoring from Edwards and Boston Scientific, travel grants from Edwards, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic, is a member of a clinical event committee for Highlife and of a steering committee for Envisage and Daiichi Sankyo. All other others declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The patient recruitment process. HF indicates heart failure; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; LV, left ventricular.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplots—Leukocyte indices at baseline. MLR indicates monocyte–lymphocyte ratio; NLR, neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio; PIV, pan-immune inflammation value.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot—multivariate Cox regression for the combined endpoint.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier curves for the combined endpoint. (a) Neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (log rank p < 0.001). (b) Monocyte–lymphocyte ratio (log rank p = 0.002). (c) Pan-immune inflammation value (log rank p < 0.001).

References

    1. Borlaug B.A., Sharma K., Shah S.J., Ho J.E. Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: JACC Scientific Statement. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2023;81:1810–1834. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.01.049. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanders-Van Wijk S., Tromp J., Beussink-Nelson L., Hage C., Svedlund S., Saraste A., Swat S.A., Sanchez C., Njoroge J., Tan R.S., et al. Proteomic Evaluation of the Comorbidity-Inflammation Paradigm in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Results from the PROMIS-HFpEF Study. Circulation. 2020;142:2029–2044. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.045810. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Regan J.A., Truby L.K., Tahir U.A., Katz D.H., Nguyen M., Kwee L.C., Deng S., Wilson J.G., Mentz R.J., Kraus W.E., et al. Protein Biomarkers of Cardiac Remodeling and Inflammation Associated with HFpEF and Incident Events. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:20072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24226-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Eltelbany M., Shah P., deFilippi C. Biomarkers in HFpEF for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Biological Phenotyping. Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 2022;19:412–424. doi: 10.1007/s11897-022-00578-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Curran F.M., Bhalraam U., Mohan M., Singh J.S., Anker S.D., Dickstein K., Doney A.S., Filippatos G., George J., Metra M., et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio and Outcomes in Patients with New-onset or Worsening Heart Failure with Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction. ESC Heart Fail. 2021;8:3168. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13424. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources