Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 25;12(19):1919.
doi: 10.3390/healthcare12191919.

Effects of Water Immersion Versus Epidural as Analgesic Methods during Labor among Low-Risk Women: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Effects of Water Immersion Versus Epidural as Analgesic Methods during Labor among Low-Risk Women: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Carmen Herrero-Orenga et al. Healthcare (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Adequate pain relief during childbirth is a very important issue for women and healthcare providers. This study investigates the effects on maternal and neonatal outcomes of two analgesic methods during labor: water immersion and epidural analgesia.

Methods: In this retrospective observational cohort study at a first-level hospital, in Spain, from 2009 to 2019, 1134 women, low-risk singleton and at term pregnancy, were selected. Among them, 567 women used water immersion; 567 women used epidural analgesia for pain control. Maternal outcomes included mode of birth and perineum condition. Neonatal outcomes included 5 min Apgar score, umbilical cord arterial pH, and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admissions. Chi-square tests and Mann-Whitney U tests, together with their effect sizes (Cramer's V, odds ratio, and Cohen's d) were used to test the main hypotheses.

Results: Spontaneous vaginal birth was almost 17 times more likely in the water immersion group (OR = 16.866 [6.540, 43.480], p < 0.001), whereas the odds of having a cesarean birth were almost 40 times higher in the epidural group (OR = 39.346 [3.610, 429.120], p < 0.001). The odds of having an intact perineum were more than two times higher for the water immersion group (OR = 2.606 [1.290, 5.250], p = 0.007), whereas having an episiotomy was more than eight times more likely for the epidural group (OR = 8.307 [2.800, 24.610], p < 0.001). Newborns in the water immersion group showed a better 5 min Apgar score and umbilical cord arterial pH and lower rates in admissions at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Conclusions: Women choosing water immersion as an analgesic method were no more likely to experience adverse outcomes and presented better results than women choosing epidural analgesia.

Keywords: analgesia; epidural; maternal and newborn outcomes; pain relief; perineal trauma; water immersion; waterbirth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Women attended to during the study period at the maternity ward and establishment of the groups.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standardized residuals for maternal outcomes among study groups. Notes: SVB = spontaneous vaginal Birth; OVB = operative vaginal birth; CS = cesarean section; Minor l. = minor laceration; Major l. = major laceration.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Standardized residuals for newborn outcomes among study groups. Notes: HNs = healthy newborns; NDTPs = newborns with difficulties in the transitional period; NICUs = newborns admitted to Neonatal Intensive Care Units; Not NICUs = newborns who did not require Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shnol H., Paul N., Belfer I. Labor Pain Mechanisms. Int. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2014;52:1–17. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henderson J., Burns E.E., Regalia A.L., Casarico G., Boulton M.G., Smith L.A. Labouring Women Who Used a Birthing Pool in Obsteric Units in Italy: Prospective Observational Study. [(accessed on 24 February 2024)];BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 14:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-17. Available online: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/17. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neiman E., Austin E., Tan A., Anderson C.M., Chipps E. Outcomes of Waterbirth in a US Hospital-Based Midwifery Practice: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Water Immersion During Labor and Birth. J. Midwifery Womens Health. 2020;65:216–223. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cluett E.R., Burns E., Cuthbert A. Immersion in water during labour and birth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018;5:CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ranzcog . Water Immersion during Labour and Birth. Ranzcog; Melbourne, Australia: 2021.

LinkOut - more resources