Microalgae Flocculation: Assessment of Extraction Yields and Biological Activity
- PMID: 39408567
- PMCID: PMC11477090
- DOI: 10.3390/ijms251910238
Microalgae Flocculation: Assessment of Extraction Yields and Biological Activity
Abstract
Downstream costs represent one of the main obstacles to enabling microalgae to become widespread. The development of an economical, easily scaled-up strategy could reduce the overall process costs. Here, different flocculants were tested on different microalgae strains and a cyanobacterium. The results indicate that flocculation could be an alternative to centrifugation, as CaCl2 induced a complete flocculation of green and red marine strains (96 ± 4% and 87.0 ± 0.5%, respectively), whereas Chitosan was the only agent able to induce flocculation on the cyanobacterium (46 ± 1%). As for the thermoacidophilic red microalga, 100% flocculation was achieved only by increasing the pH. Carotenoids were extracted from the flocculated biomass, and the strategy improved with the use of the wet biomass. The results indicate that flocculation does not affect carotenoid yield, which is at least the same than that obtained upon centrifugation and extraction from the wet biomass. Then, for the first time, the biological activity of the extracts obtained from the flocculated biomasses was evaluated. The results indicate that only the green microalga extract shows increased antioxidant activity. In conclusion, this work highlights that a general downstream procedure cannot be developed for microalgae strains but should be rationally tailored.
Keywords: antioxidant activity; flocculation; green extraction; harvesting; industrial processes; microalgae.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Flocculation properties of several microalgae and a cyanobacterium species during ferric chloride, chitosan and alkaline flocculation.Bioresour Technol. 2016 Nov;220:464-470. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.080. Epub 2016 Aug 24. Bioresour Technol. 2016. PMID: 27611030
-
Methods coagulation/flocculation and flocculation with ballast agent for effective harvesting of microalgae.Bioresour Technol. 2015 Oct;193:178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.097. Epub 2015 Jun 25. Bioresour Technol. 2015. PMID: 26133475
-
A rapid, efficient and eco-friendly approach for simultaneous biomass harvesting and bioproducts extraction from microalgae: Dual flocculation between cationic surfactants and bio-polymer.Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 1;854:158717. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158717. Epub 2022 Sep 13. Sci Total Environ. 2023. Retraction in: Sci Total Environ. 2025 Jun 10;980:179503. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179503. PMID: 36108873 Retracted.
-
The bioactivities and biotechnological production approaches of carotenoids derived from microalgae and cyanobacteria.Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2025 Mar;45(2):276-304. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2024.2359966. Epub 2024 Jul 22. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2025. PMID: 39038957 Review.
-
[Harvesting microalgae via flocculation: a review].Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2015 Feb;31(2):161-71. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2015. PMID: 26062338 Review. Chinese.
References
-
- Acién Fernández F.G., Fernández Sevilla J.M., Molina Grima E. Chapter 21—Costs Analysis of Microalgae Production. In: Pandey A., Chang J.-S., Soccol C.R., Lee D.-J., Chisti Y.B.T.-B., editors. Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2019. pp. 551–566.
-
- Udayan A., Pandey A.K., Sharma P., Sreekumar N., Kumar S. Emerging Industrial Applications of Microalgae: Challenges and Future Perspectives. Syst. Microbiol. Biomanuf. 2021;1:411–431. doi: 10.1007/s43393-021-00038-8. - DOI
-
- Roy M., Mohanty K. A Comprehensive Review on Microalgal Harvesting Strategies: Current Status and Future Prospects. Algal Res. 2019;44:101683. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2019.101683. - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials