Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct 4;13(19):2790.
doi: 10.3390/plants13192790.

Hybrid Prediction in Horticulture Crop Breeding: Progress and Challenges

Affiliations
Review

Hybrid Prediction in Horticulture Crop Breeding: Progress and Challenges

Ce Liu et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

In the context of rapidly increasing population and diversified market demands, the steady improvement of yield and quality in horticultural crops has become an urgent challenge that modern breeding efforts must tackle. Heterosis, a pivotal theoretical foundation for plant breeding, facilitates the creation of superior hybrids through crossbreeding and selection among a variety of parents. However, the vast number of potential hybrids presents a significant challenge for breeders in efficiently predicting and selecting the most promising candidates. The development and refinement of effective hybrid prediction methods have long been central to research in this field. This article systematically reviews the advancements in hybrid prediction for horticultural crops, including the roles of marker-assisted breeding and genomic prediction in phenotypic forecasting. It also underscores the limitations of some predictors, like genetic distance, which do not consistently offer reliable hybrid predictions. Looking ahead, it explores the integration of phenomics with genomic prediction technologies as a means to elevate prediction accuracy within actual breeding programs.

Keywords: genomic prediction; heterosis; hybrid prediction; marker-assisted selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Common concepts of heterosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Genetic differences and prediction methods for qualitative and quantitative traits.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predictors of heterosis: genetic distance and non-additive effects.

Similar articles

References

    1. Liu J., Li M., Zhang Q., Wei X., Huang X. Exploring the molecular basis of heterosis for plant breeding. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020;62:287–298. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12804. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yu D., Gu X., Zhang S., Dong S., Miao H., Gebretsadik K., Bo K. Molecular basis of heterosis and related breeding strategies reveal its importance in vegetable breeding. Hortic. Res. 2021;8:120. doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00552-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen Z.J. Genomic and epigenetic insights into the molecular bases of heterosis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013;14:471–482. doi: 10.1038/nrg3503. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li G., Carver B.F., Cowger C., Bai G., Xu X. Pm223899, A New Recessive Powdery Mildew Resist. Gene Identified Afghan. Landrace PI 223899. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018;131:2775–2783. doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3199-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hochholdinger F., Yu P. Molecular concepts to explain heterosis in crops. Trends Plant Sci. :2024. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2024.07.018. in press . - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources