Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 25;14(19):2763.
doi: 10.3390/ani14192763.

Amino Acid Content in the Muscles of the Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) from Three Types of Feeding Grounds

Affiliations

Amino Acid Content in the Muscles of the Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) from Three Types of Feeding Grounds

Anna Kasprzyk. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the amino acid profile, with a particular focus on the nutritional value of the protein of the longissimus lumborum (LL) and the semimembranosus (SM) muscles of deer originating from three feeding grounds: forest (FFG); conventional (CFG) grounds; organic farm (OFG). This is the first time that deer from an organic farm feeding ground have been included in this study. The muscles were collected from 36 deer carcasses with equal proportions of sex and 31 months of age. This study demonstrated significantly higher essential amino acid (EAA) and non-essential amino acid (NEAA) contents in the muscles of deer from the FFG and CFG compared to the OFG. However, the EAA-to-NEAA ratio was significantly higher for the muscles of deer from the OFG. The muscles of the FFG and CFG deer were characterized by a higher concentration of lysine as well as acidic and tasty amino acids compared to the OFG deer, with the muscles of the latter exhibiting a higher percentage of branched-chain amino acids (BCAA). The results obtained can be used professionally by nutrition specialists in preventive and therapeutic diets and breeders to make decisions about farm location and deer feeding strategies.

Keywords: biological value; game; meat; nutritional value; protein; venison.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Soriano A., Sánchez-García C. Nutritional composition of game meat from wild species harvested in Europe. In: Ranabhat C.L., editor. Meat and Nutrition. Intech Open; London, UK: 2021. pp. 77–100. - DOI
    1. Zin M., Mroczek J.R., Mroczek K. Walory surowca mięsnego pozyskiwanego od jeleniowatych. Gospod. Mięsna. 2019;9:23–25.
    1. Sevillano-Morales J., Sevillano-Caño J., Amaro-López M.A., Cámara-Martos F. Probabilistic assessment of the intake of trace elements by consumption of Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) and Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) meat. Appl. Sci. 2023;13:13263. doi: 10.3390/app132413263. - DOI
    1. Kożuch A. Strategic analysis of the venison market in Poland. Sylwan. 2020;164:254–264. (In Polish in English Abstract)
    1. Niewiadomska K., Kosicka-Gębska M., Gębski J., Gutkowska K., Jeżewska-Zychowicz M., Sułek M. Game meat consumption-conscious choice or just a game? Foods. 2020;9:1357. doi: 10.3390/foods9101357. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources