Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 28;14(19):2162.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192162.

Impact of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria in Women with Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome during Pregnancy

Affiliations

Impact of the 2023 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria in Women with Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome during Pregnancy

Víctor M Martínez-Taboada et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: ACR/EULAR has recently developed new classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The present study aims to analyze the impact of these new 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in a cohort of pregnant women with primary APS. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 93 consecutive pregnant women attending the Autoimmune Diseases Pregnancy Clinic, a multidisciplinary unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital, between 2005 and 2023. All of them fulfilled the Sydney classification criteria for APS. Women diagnosed with rheumatic autoimmune diseases other than APS were excluded. Results: Twenty-four out of ninety-three patients (25.8%) met the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria for APS. Patients who met the new classification criteria were very similar to those who did not, except for being younger (p < 0.001), and had a lower number of clinical pregnancies (p = 0.004). The obstetric domain was clearly underrepresented in women who fulfilled the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria (p < 0.001). Patients meeting the new classification criteria were primarily characterized by preterm births before 34 weeks due to severe placentation disorders (p = 0.004). Women with early and late fetal loss were significantly underrepresented (p < 0.0001 and 0.03, respectively). Nearly half of these patients had thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001). Serologically, these patients showed a higher frequency of persistent lupus anticoagulant (p = 0.02) and a lower frequency of IgM isotype antiphospholipid antibodies (p = 0.05). Conclusions: Almost three-quarters of the patients included in the study did not meet the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria. Most patients who could not be classified according to these new classification criteria were those with early and/or late fetal deaths, as well as patients carrying only IgM aCL/AB2GPI antibodies. The high specificity of the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria, restricted to severe placentation disorders, may leave the majority of patients with obstetric APS out of the new classification criteria.

Keywords: antiphospholipid antibodies; antiphospholipid syndrome; classification criteria; fetal loss; obstetric morbidity; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Main pregnancy outcomes according to the Sidney and the 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. The figure shows the main pregnancy outcomes, including live birth (LB) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO), with and without treatment, in patients who fulfilled the Sidney and the 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Impact of the 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome followed during pregnancy. The figure shows the overall impact and the impact according to the different domains (D) included in the new classification criteria. D4A: ≥3 pre-fetal abortion (<10 weeks) and/or fetal (10 w 0 d–15 w 6 d) deaths; D4B: fetal (16 w 0 d–33 w 6 d) deaths in the absence of PEC or PI; D4C: preeclampsia with severe features (<34 w 0 d) or PI with severe features (<34 w 0 d) with/without fetal death; D4D: preeclampsia with severe features (<34 w 0 d) and PI with severe features (<34 w 0 d) with/without fetal death.

References

    1. Miyakis S., Lockshin M.D., Atsumi T., Branch D.W., Brey R.L., Cervera R., Derkesen R.H.W.M., De Groot P.G., Koike T., Meroni P.L., et al. International Consensus Statement on an Update of the Classification Criteria for Definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) J. Thromb. Haemost. 2006;4:295–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wendell A., Wilson M.A.K. International Consensus Statement on Preliminary Classification Criteria for Definite Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Report of an International Workshop. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1309–1311. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199907)42:7<1309::AID-ANR1>3.0.CO;2-F. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbhaiya M., Zuily S., Naden R., Hendry A., Manneville F., Amigo M.C., Amoura Z., Andrade D., Andreoli L., Artim-Esen B., et al. 2023 ACR/EULAR Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2023;82:1258–1270. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224609. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knight J.S., Erkan D. Rethinking Antiphospholipid Syndrome to Guide Future Management and Research. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2024;20:377–388. doi: 10.1038/s41584-024-01110-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbhaiya M., Zuily S., Ahmadzadeh Y., Amigo M.C., Avcin T., Bertolaccini M.L., Branch D.W., de Jesus G., Devreese K.M.J., Frances C., et al. Development of a New International Antiphospholipid Syndrome Classification Criteria Phase I/II Report: Generation and Reduction of Candidate Criteria. Arthritis Care Res. 2021;73:1490–1501. doi: 10.1002/acr.24520. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources