Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Oct 15;14(10):e082572.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082572.

Telephone lifestyle intervention to prevent diabetes in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus attending the national health system: the LINDA-Brasil clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Telephone lifestyle intervention to prevent diabetes in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus attending the national health system: the LINDA-Brasil clinical trial

Maria Inês Schmidt et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate a postpartum telephone-based lifestyle intervention to prevent diabetes in high-risk women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Design: Multicentre parallel randomised clinical trial.

Setting: Specialised antenatal clinics in the Brazilian National System.

Methods: Lifestyle Intervention for Diabetes Prevention After Pregnancy compared (1:1) postpartum telephone support for lifestyle changes with conventional care in women with recent GDM at substantial risk for diabetes. Randomisation started on 28 March 2015 and ended on 13 March 2020, with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. We used Cox regression to estimate HRs for diabetes and analysis of covariance adjusted for follow-up time to assess weight change.

Outcomes: The primary outcome was incident diabetes ascertained with blinded measurements of oral glucose tolerance tests. The secondary outcome was a change in measured weight.

Results: We enrolled 5323 women with GDM, 2735 (51%) being at high risk. After invitations, baseline assessment and exclusions, we assigned 466 women to intervention (231) or control (235) groups. Attendance was satisfactory (≥7/20 phone sessions) in 75%. Over an average follow-up of 29.7 (15.6) months, 142 (30.5%) women progressed to diabetes, 75 (32%) in the control and 67 (29%) in the intervention group. There was no reduction in the incidence of diabetes (HR=0.84; 0.60-1.19) and only a non-significant 0.97 kg less weight gain (p=0.09). Among the 305 women randomised more than 1 year before the COVID-19 pandemic, the intervention did not reduce the incidence of diabetes (HR=0.71; 0.48-1.04) despite a 2.09 kg (p=0.002) lesser weight gain.

Conclusion: The strategy to identify women with GDM at high risk proved valid, as women often gained weight and frequently developed diabetes. Over a 30-month follow-up, telephone support for lifestyle changes at postpartum did not reduce weight gain or diabetes incidence, although only 75% attended the minimum number of telephone sessions. The COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted trial conduction.

Trial registration number: NCT02327286.

Keywords: Clinical Trial; General diabetes; Obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow chart for the analytic sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curves for the incidence of diabetes according to treatment group. Top graph: overall sample (n=466). Bottom graph: after excluding those randomised within 1 year before the COVID-19 pandemic (n=310). Intervention, red; control, blue.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Effects of a telephone-based lifestyle intervention on the incidence of diabetes according to specific characteristics. N=466.

References

    1. Zhou B, Lu Y, Hajifathalian K. Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387:1513–30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haw JS, Galaviz KI, Straus AN, et al. Long-term Sustainability of Diabetes Prevention Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:1808–17. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galaviz KI, Weber MB, Straus A, et al. Global Diabetes Prevention Interventions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Real-World Impact on Incidence, Weight, and Glucose. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:1526–34. doi: 10.2337/dc17-2222. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vounzoulaki E, Khunti K, Abner SC, et al. Progression to type 2 diabetes in women with a known history of gestational diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;369:m1361. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1361. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ratner RE, Christophi CA, Metzger BE, et al. Prevention of diabetes in women with a history of gestational diabetes: effects of metformin and lifestyle interventions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4774–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0772. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data